Big Game Hunter

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Big Game Hunter

Fundraiser Terry McAuliffe knew how to bag big donors for President Clinton, but has the stalker now become the prey?

by J. Jennings Moss

On his 40th birthday in early February, Terry McAuliffe gathered a dozen or so friends and family members at the venerable Hay-Adams Hotel for a Beltway power broker’s dream party. Before the guests had even finished their appetizers, President Bill Clinton had crossed the street from the White House and then lingered to eat, drink, and sing tunes from “Hello, Dolly!” with McAuliffe’s 74-year-old mother, Millie. Soon after, Vice President Al Gore, fresh off a plane from Chicago, stopped by to pay his respects.

McAuliffe had every reason to celebrate. The chief fundraiser for the president’s re-election campaign, he had rounded up record funds in record time to pave the way for a Democratic victory in 1996. Only a few weeks earlier, he had co-chaired Clinton’s Inauguration Day festivities, waving to spectators along the parade route from the lead car, the one just in front of the first family.

But the birthday party also was set amid a tense reality. Reporters were daily uncovering pieces of the mounting Democratic campaign finance scandals. Up to that point, McAuliffe had avoided mention in those stories. But within two weeks of his bash, he was identified as the man who started the White House kaffeeklatsches for major party contributors and as the memo writer who sparked the president’s decision to “rent out” the Lincoln Bedroom. (An eventual summons from congressional investigators seems likely.)

McAuliffe may also have other worries. According to a congressional source, the Department of Justice is considering whether McAuliffe exploited his political connections to profit from at least one government-related business deal (see McAuliffe Inc.).

None of this has dimmed McAuliffe’s star, however. He’s adored within Democratic Party circles — Gore has called him “the greatest fundraiser in the history of the universe.” And McAuliffe seems to concur. “Let me tell you,” he says. “I can motivate. I can sell. I can get people pumped up.”

McAuliffe’s history confirms that he can indeed sell — though what exactly he’s selling is problematic. He came of professional and political age as the Democratic Party was deciding that in order to beat the Republicans, it had to focus on fundraising. McAuliffe learned the finer arts of the trade at the elbow of former Rep. Tony Coelho (D-Calif.). (“You could sense about him that here was a guy who’s going to be a superstar,” Coelho now says.) Although Coelho left the House in disgrace after a big donor helped him structure a sweetheart junk bond deal, McAuliffe has continued to play the game unfazed. “I would think for a majority of the big donors, they want to be part of the action,” McAuliffe told Mother Jones. “It’s fun, it’s exciting, it’s sexy, it’s got a lot of things to it that they want to be part of. Nobody comes in and says, ‘Hey, for this, I’ll give you that,’ because you’d throw them out of the office.”

But even members of Democratic Party inner circles find the level to which McAuliffe elevated the pursuit of cash distasteful. Still, the real issue is that his bosses love the guy. From the White House’s perspective, McAuliffe did a “spectacular” job in 1996 — and nothing improper in carrying it out. “If he’s able to raise money in larger and larger increments and do it within the law, then that’s the whole object of the game,” says a senior White House official.

McAuliffe is certainly not the first fundraiser to prescribe that lawmakers meet with financial supporters, but in auctioning off access to the White House, he does appear to have taken the practice to unprecedented lengths. On a personal level, the fuzziness of his ethics has blurred the boundaries between his political and business dealings. And in conversations with Mother Jones, McAuliffe has had a hard time sticking to the same story.

McAuliffe’s rise has been swift and methodical. He earned a reputation for tireless campaign work on behalf of Jimmy Carter’s failed 1980 re-election campaign, which he joined right after finishing up classes at Catholic University. It was then that he first caught the attention of political reporters, who are fond of repeating the tale of how McAuliffe wrestled a 260-pound alligator just to get a $5,000 contribution.

He then attended Georgetown law school, graduating in 1984. Along the way he registered as a lobbyist, a career path he soon decided wasn’t for him, and eventually returned to raising money for the Democrats. That’s when he fell under the tutelage of Coelho, who tapped him as Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee finance chairman in 1986. (When asked about the DCCC donor whose financial help subsequently disgraced Coelho, McAuliffe told reporters he’d only met the fellow once.) And McAuliffe’s Coelho connection has continued — the two were accused of influence peddling in two 1995 lawsuits that were later settled (see McAuliffe Inc.).

Throughout all McAuliffe’s fundraising work, he remained a volunteer, and he made money by forming the Washington law and lobbying firm McAuliffe, Kelly — though he says he himself never lobbied. In 1987, McAuliffe became finance chief for Rep. Richard Gephardt’s presidential primary campaign, and, shortly before, he had served on the board of the Federal City National Bank, which loaned the Gephardt campaign a total of $1.4 million. While he worked for the Missouri Democrat, his business and political ties came under scrutiny when it appeared that some of the loans were unsecured, a charge later denied by McAuliffe and Federal City. McAuliffe told reporters at the time that he had abstained from voting on the approval of the loans.

After a stint raising money for Clinton’s 1992 campaign, McAuliffe again returned to the private sector — sort of. Clinton named him commissioner general (a title equal in rank to that of ambassador) for a 1993 technology exposition in South Korea. In that position, McAuliffe convinced American businesses to contribute $3 million so the United States could be represented at the exposition. The biggest contributor was Amway, usually a staunch Republican supporter, which gave $500,000 to the effort.

By March 1994, McAuliffe says, he had left his law and lobbying firm to become Democratic National Committee (DNC) finance chair. And even though he rented office space from the firm and regularly received buyout payments for his share of the partnership, he claims he no longer had any financial stake in the firm, renamed Raffaelli, Spees, Springer & Smith.

Meanwhile, the firm enjoyed a surge in foreign clients. During the Korean exposition, McAuliffe had met with members of the Korean Foreign Trade Association. When Raffaelli, Spees landed the KFTA account in September 1994, other lobbyists complained that the South Koreans had chosen the firm because of McAuliffe’s ties to Clinton.

In light of the Democrats’ foreign money campaign scandals, some of McAuliffe’s other business ties now look questionable. Several months before McAuliffe left to run the DNC, for example, his firm was one of many to represent the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO), the unofficial embassy of Taiwan. Illegal foreign campaign contributions from Taiwan have been a focal point in the current investigation of Democratic fundraising. Although TECRO has not been implicated in any illegal fundraising activities, in early March, the Los Angeles Times cited an unidentified Taiwanese official who claims TECRO brokered contributions from Chinese-Americans to candidates of both parties.

McAuliffe also has a remote connection to the infamous April 1996 DNC fundraiser at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple, which raised $140,000 from questionable sources. The Los Angeles temple is represented by McAuliffe’s former West Coast partner and fellow Democratic fundraiser Peter Kelly. Unlike his former partner, McAuliffe has so far managed to avoid the taint of the foreign money scandals.

In 1994, two days after Christmas, McAuliffe shared a private breakfast with President Clinton to discuss the Democratic misfortunes in the midterm elections. The party had suffered its worst beating in 40 years when it lost control of both the House and the Senate, and Clinton seemed doomed to only one term. But McAuliffe was reassuring. All the president had to do, he said, was meet personally with his financial supporters in order to fill a war chest that would bankroll political resurrection. The people-hungry Clinton readily agreed.

About a week later, McAuliffe sent a memo to Clinton’s scheduler asking for three dates when the president could dine or drink coffee with major backers. That memo, part of a trove of documents kept by then-Deputy Chief of Staff Harold Ickes and later handed over to Hill investigators, included the names of the Democrats’ top 10 backers. It also prompted Clinton to scribble the now-infamous word “overnights” next to the 10 names, and to add, “get other names at 100,000 or more, 50,000 or more.”

When asked about the memo, McAuliffe had a simple response: He said he had nothing to do with the Lincoln Bedroom stays. As for the potentially most troubling aspect of the fundraising controversy — that foreign money was channeled into DNC coffers — McAuliffe strenuously maintained he was uninvolved. “I ran Clinton/Gore in 1995,” he said. “All the problems that have occurred [at the DNC] have occurred on another watch.”

McAuliffe’s assertion, which he would later recant in significant ways, is crucial to understanding the current campaign finance scandals. In the 1970s, Congress limited individual contributions to candidates, but it left unrestricted the amounts donors could give to the parties, as long as the gifts were not targeted to specific candidates. Among the issues surrounding the 1996 elections has been the charge that the Clinton/Gore campaign effectively directed fundraising and tactical spending at the DNC.

McAuliffe’s claims to the contrary strike some as insincere. “It was one fundraising system with two roads that ran from it,” says a longtime Democratic operative with close ties to McAuliffe. “Terry was in charge of the fundraising system for the president. It doesn’t matter if you call it the DNC or you call it Clinton/Gore. Everything was so tightly coordinated.”

McAuliffe has also argued that he was not involved in the campaign during most of 1996, when many apparent fundraising abuses — such as the hundreds of thousands of dollars solicited from questionable sources by DNC fundraiser John Huang — took place.

“From November [1995] until September [1996] I was gone,” McAuliffe stressed during a first interview with Mother Jones in early March. He said he left when the Clinton/Gore committee reached the maximum total in contributions allowed by law. Miami lawyer Marvin Rosen took over fundraising at the DNC shortly thereafter, and McAuliffe says he didn’t return until September to help the DNC make a final fundraising push. “It’s like my mother thinks I hired John Huang,” McAuliffe said. “I’ve never met John Huang.”

But McAuliffe was contradicting his own statements from other interviews, in which he said he had met Huang briefly at a 1996 dinner. Also, Huang and his wife, Jane, contributed $25,000 to the DNC while McAuliffe was DNC finance chairman in 1994.

More importantly, McAuliffe’s denial that he did any fundraising for either Clinton/Gore or the DNC during that troubled period of 1996 just doesn’t hold. “He moved over to take control of the DNC fundraising” early in 1996, says Dick Morris, who was Clinton’s chief political adviser until Morris’ marital infidelities with a Washington prostitute ended the association.

And Morris ought to know. He was the one charged with figuring out ways to spend the money McAuliffe brought in. The two men never took part in the same meetings, according to Morris, but they did meet privately on a few occasions. When pushed about McAuliffe’s political role in 1996, Morris backpedals, saying it was only his perception that McAuliffe became a force within the DNC: “I don’t know what McAuliffe did in ’96. I had heard they would move him over to the DNC fundraising operation.”

Clinton/Gore campaign manager Peter Knight also says McAuliffe played a big role in 1996 for the president’s campaign, calling him “a major player for us, not on the money side, but on the political side.” McAuliffe, Knight says, made appearances on behalf of the president and mobilized business support for the Democratic ticket.

And one day after McAuliffe first spoke to Mother Jones, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that Philadelphia philanthropist Peter L. Buttenwieser had received a call from McAuliffe asking for a $50,000 contribution that would guarantee him a seat at the president’s table at a June 17, 1996, lunch. Not only did Buttenwieser say no, but later wrote a letter to McAuliffe, saying: “I do not want to ‘work’ my way into a luncheon with the president. It’s no fun that way and it’s not right.” (McAuliffe has denied the interaction with Buttenwieser, calling him a “kook.”)

In a second interview with Mother Jones, McAuliffe changes his story, acknowledging that he raised money in the spring and summer of 1996. He estimates he raised $3-$5 million for the Democrats and was present at two intimate White House lunches during the period, blaming his involvement on big-money contributors who didn’t want to deal with anybody else. “People knew I was close to the president,” he shrugs. “Probably closer than most people. So they wanted to be with me.”

At this point, the motivational pitchman who can “sell” is replaced by an operative professing fundraising fatigue. “I’m tired of the dough,” he says. “I don’t ever want to do it again.” For the next two years, McAuliffe says, he’ll concentrate on his home-building business, American Heritage Homes.

But he has no plans to retire from political life. Already he is said to be enjoying entreaties from likely primary opponents Gore and Gephardt. “I will be very active in the 2000 election,” McAuliffe says. “Let’s just leave it at that.”

J. Jennings Moss is a Washington, D.C., writer who has been Washington correspondent for The Advocate and covered politics for the Washington Times.


The 400 List:

The full Mother Jones 400 list.

Meet the people with political pull.



Search the top 400 political donors by name, industry, state, or contribution amount.

Itemized Contributions
The details of every donation, searchable by donor, recipient, date, amount, and more.



Money & Politics
Is campaign finance reform the way to a better government?


Straight to the point: Donations have been concerningly slow for our hugely important First $500,000 fundraising campaign. We urgently need your help, and a lot of help, over the next few weeks so we can pay for the one-of-a-kind journalism you get from us.

Learn more in “Less Dreading, More Doing,” where we lay out this wild moment and how we can keep charging hard for you. And please help if you can: $5, $50, or $500—every gift from every person truly matters right now.

payment methods


Straight to the point: Donations have been concerningly slow for our hugely important First $500,000 fundraising campaign. We urgently need your help, and a lot of help, over the next few weeks so we can pay for the one-of-a-kind journalism you get from us.

Learn more in “Less Dreading, More Doing,” where we lay out this wild moment and how we can keep charging hard for you. And please help if you can: $5, $50, or $500—every gift from every person truly matters right now.

payment methods

We Recommend


Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.