Non-Exempt


“Most countries are exempt.” This is simply not true. Under the U.S. proposals that are to be put forward in Kyoto, no countries will be exempted. Developing nations as well as the big industrial countries will have to begin cutting back on their CO2 emissions in order to deal with this global crisis. (On a practical level, advanced nations may have to provide technological know-how to developing countries so they can choose alternative energy paths rather then rely on carbon-rich coal and petroleum.)

The original idea of exempting the poorer countries, set forth at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, was based on the belief that the developed nations, being by far the gassiest, should act first to set an example. Unfortunately, the U.S. and other industrialized nations failed to meet their own “voluntary goals”: On Earth Day 1993 President Clinton pledged the U.S. would cut its greenhouse emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000, but in fact they’ve jumped 8 percent already.

Now the Clinton administration will go to Kyoto with a proposal to reduce global output to its 1990 level sometime between 2008 and 2012. This is seen as woefully inadequate by the European Union, Japan (whose proposals are also seen as weak, but not as weak as ours) and the Alliance of Small Island States, who face the loss of their very existence should sea levels rise as projected (Florida and New Orleans, take note). The fossil fuels industry, on the other hand, sees any kind of binding goal for CO2 reduction as unacceptable — although some of them have expressed thanks to Clinton for choosing the weakest proposal his White House advisors presented.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.