Tobacco’s Belated Confessions

It’s taken over 70 years and a lot of hedging for tobacco companies to admit the truth.

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


As a result of lawsuits across the country, tobacco companies have been forced to release an ever-increasing number of documents which show that they were aware of the deadly effects and addictive nature of nicotine. So how do you counter that kind of bad press? Tobacco companies are trying a bold new strategy—it’s called the truth. Just last month, some tobacco company CEOs finally admitted that tobacco is addictive. Way to go, guys.

But honesty hasn’t always been the best policy. The MoJo Wire takes a look at the evolution of tobacco spin:

 

First, say your cigarettes are healthier

“It’s Toasted. ‘Toasting,’ the most modern step in cigarette manufacturing, removes from LUCKY STRIKE harmful irritants which are present in cigarettes manufactured in the old-fashioned way. . . LUCKY STRIKE’S extra secret process. . . removes harmful corrosive acrids (pungent irritants). . .which in the old-fashioned manufacture of cigarettes cause throat irritation and coughing. . . 20,679 Physicians Say Luckies Are Less Irritating. . .”
Lucky Strike advertisement from 1926.

 

Then be sure to firmly deny any dangers

“We do not believe that cigarettes are hazardous; we don’t accept that.”
—Joseph Cullman, Philip Morris and chairman of the Tobacco Institute executive committee, responding to the infamous beagle study in 1971 on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

 

If the science isn’t going your way, avoid it

“[Regarding] our recommendations for industry research which we prepared last year. . . I have added a list of three subjects which I feel should be avoided. . . 1. Developing new tests for carcinogenicity, 2. Attempt to relate human disease to smoking, 3. Conduct experiments which require large doses of carcinogen to show additive effect of smoking.”
—Robert Seligman, Philip Morris R&D vice president, to Alexander Spears, his counterpart at Lorillard, in the spring of 1980.

 

If need be, say smoking may be dangerous

“Q: Sir, my last question to you is—is very simply this. Would Philip Morris agree that a single American citizen who smoked their products for 30 or more years, a single one, has ever died of disease caused in part by smoking cigarettes?
A: I think there’s a fair chance that one would have, yes. Might have.
Q: How about a thousand?
A: Might have.
Q: A hundred thousand?
A: Might have.”
Geoffrey Bible, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Philip Morris Co., August 21, 1997 in a deposition in the Florida state tobacco lawsuit.

 

If all else fails try the truth, within quotes

“Tobacco is a risky product. . . and under some definitions, cigarette smoking is ‘addictive.'”
Geoffrey Bible, chairman of Philip Morris Co., in a testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives on January 29, 1998.

Unfortunately, some tobacco executives seem to be behind on the learning curve. Speaking to Congress immediately after Bible, Nicholas G. Brooks, chairman of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., disagreed with his use of the word “addictive”—”I personally would not use that term.”

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate