Testing the Waters (continued)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


next

The Navy says it plans to use binoculars and hydrophones to watch and listen for whales that are too close. “They can’t do that,” says Weilgart. “It’s bogus.” That’s because whales are only near the surface a fraction of the time, she says, and they often stop singing as soon as they hear a noise, such as that of a boat. In anticipation of such criticism, the Navy is now scrambling to develop a high-frequency sonar “fish finder” to improve detection. Even with this new technology, Fristrup says they can guarantee only a 70-percent detection rate.

But even a 100-percent success rate may not satisfy LFAS opponents. According to Roger Gentry of the National Marine Fisheries Service, who has reviewed the draft EIS, the one-kilometer cushion is based on the assumption that anything up to 180 decibels is safe enough for animals at that distance. Although scientists differ on how to translate underwater sounds into their above-water equivalents, 180 decibels is comparable to what you’d hear at a Metallica concert.

What is certain is that, because sound as measured in decibels increases logarithmically, 180 decibels is 400 times louder than 155 decibels — the maximum intensity to which whales were exposed during the EIS testing. Fristrup, Tyack, and Clark said they would be reluctant or unwilling to participate in a test involving exposing animals to a 180-decibel sound level. Although there is no definitive data on whales, based on what scientists know about other mammals, 180 decibels is about the level at which, depending on the conditions again, some species will suffer temporary hearing loss.

Nevertheless, the Navy appears determined to go forward. “The public doesn’t have to approve this document,” says EIS Program Director Joe Johnson. You will, however, have 30 to 60 days to comment after the draft EIS is released. After the public comment period is over, the Navy will produce a final version of the EIS. Although the NRDC will attempt to force the Navy to apply to the National Marine Fisheries Service for permission to deploy LFAS, the Navy claims deployment only requires approval from, you guessed it, the Navy.

next

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate