$4.9 Billion Judgment Latest in GM Liability Saga

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The $4.9 billion judgment against General Motors this month in a fuel-tank fire case is the latest chapter in a long saga involving independent counsel and former GM lawyer Kenneth Starr, accusations of perjury and obstruction of justice, and an infamous 1973 internal memo revealing that General Motors engineer Edward Ivey had placed the value of a human life at $200,000.

The record-settling judgment in the latest case centered on a California crash in which six people in a GM pickup truck were hit from behind by a drunk driver. The truck’s fuel tank exploded, seriously burning the occupants.

This is not the first time that memo has made headlines. Back in 1994, the now-familiar Kenneth Starr was representing GM in a suit brought by a South Carolina family whose two sons had been killed in a similar GM truck explosion. Starr has been accused of covering up perjury by Ivey. In April 1998, the Justice Department decided not to open an ethics probe into Starr’s role in the alleged coverup.

It is also important to note that, amid widespread agreement in the legal community that the California decision will be reduced by another court, General Motors is enjoying one of its biggest periods of growth and profit in history. On July 20, 1999, the company announced that it had record earnings in the second quarter of 1999, with a profit of $1.7 billion. At that rate, one could extrapolate that the company can afford to lose one major case a year related to fuel-tank fires and still make a few million in profit.

Read the original MoJo Wire story that uncovered the allegations against Starr, along with key documents and updates.

DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST...

without free and fair elections, a vigorous free press, and engaged citizens to reclaim power from those who abuse it.

In this election year unlike any other—against a backdrop of a pandemic, an economic crisis, racial reckoning, and so much daily crazy—Mother Jones' journalism is driven by one simple question: Will America move closer to, or further from, justice and equity in the years to come?

If you're able to, please join us in this mission with a donation today. Our reporting right now is focused on voting rights and election security, corruption, disinformation, racial and gender equity, and the climate crisis. We can’t do it without the support of readers like you, and we need to give it everything we've got between now and November. Thank you.

DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST...

without free and fair elections, a vigorous free press, and engaged citizens to reclaim power from those who abuse it.

In this election year unlike any other—against a backdrop of a pandemic, an economic crisis, racial reckoning, and so much daily crazy—Mother Jones' journalism is driven by one simple question: Will America move closer to, or further from, justice and equity in the years to come?

If you're able to, please join us in this mission with a donation today. Our reporting right now is focused on voting rights and election security, corruption, disinformation, racial and gender equity, and the climate crisis. We can’t do it without the support of readers like you, and we need to give it everything we've got between now and November. Thank you.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate