Communism for Profiteers

Several hundred titans of American business are off to China to ponder that country’s massive market potential, and to celebrate 50 years of communism.

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


As Congress argues about alleged tranfer of sensitive military secrets and technology to China, and while officials in Beijing step up their campaign against dissidents, Fortune magazine is arranging for several hundred corporate executives to travel to Shanghai this fall, just in time to celebrate half a century of Chinese communism. The execs will be attending the invitation-only 1999 Fortune Global Forum — participation is limited to “chairmen, presidents, and CEOs of major multinational companies” — which will focus on “the practical realities of doing business in China today and into the next century.”

Entitled “China: The Next Fifty Years,” three-day event will open on Sept. 27 and conclude just prior to the official celebration on Oct. 1 marking the 50th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. Along with corporate honchos from Sweden, Germany, Finland, Brazil, Japan, India, and England, there will be American execs from companies such as Dell Computer Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Electric Co., and Honeywell Inc. Chinese business and government leaders will be on hand as well, thereby giving Global Forum participants the opportunity to, as the event’s promotional materials put it “network with good people.”

According to Fortune, some of the corporate chieftains will travel on to Beijing “for anniversary commemorations” of 50 years of communism and watch the Chinese military parade at Tiananmen Square as part of the festivities. Fortune is careful to point out, however, that the executives who do choose to go on to Beijing will be attending the fête on their own, and not as part of the conference.

One astonished China watcher on Capitol Hill, who asked not to be named, thought it more than ironic that the titans of capitalism are traveling to China to celebrate the achievements of communism. “What does it imply for the future of democracy in China? If you are struggling to bring democracy to China, you have to fight not only the secret police, but now Western business interests and the Western media as well.”

The Chinese government is rolling out the red carpet for the CEOs. They’ll be officially welcomed by President Jiang Zemin, who is scheduled to travel to Shanghai to deliver the keynote address at the opening night dinner. Jiang has also “inscribed a greeting in calligraphy, sending his personal best wishes for the Forum’s success,” according to the conference’s Web site.

Of course, no China affair would be complete without former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the man who downplayed the massacre at Tiananmen Square and who now consults for companies doing business in China. He’s slated to be the main attraction at the luncheon on the Global Forum’s second day.

Other retired government officials set to journey to Shanghai include former United States Trade Representative Carla Hills and former Commerce Secretary Mickey Kantor, who is scheduled to deliver a speech entitled “What Now for China?” Fortune has also lined up a lecture by Lee Kuan Yew, who was the notoriously law-and-order-obsessed prime minister of Singapore for 37 years and who now serves as a senior minister in that country.

The conference is being organized by Fortune’s business side — the head of the magazine’s conference division, John Needham, has temporarily moved to Shanghai to oversee planning for the gala affair — but a number of editors and journalists are attending, including some senior Fortune editors who will be moderating panel discussions. These include Norman Pearlstine, editor-in-chief of Fortune and Time magazines as well as other Time Inc. publications, and John Huey, Fortune managing editor. In a Global Forum brochure, Huey describes the affair as “the most important international event in our magazine’s 69-year history.”

next

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate