Criminal Procedure (continued)


Sherrie Chapman, one of the original plaintiffs in Shumate vs. Wilson, continues to wage her own battle against a prison system that she says has left her body ravaged and disfigured by breast cancer.

A 40-year-old woman serving a life sentence for murder at the California Institute for Women, Chapman has been in prison since 1981. In 1985, Chapman found lumps in both her left and right breasts, and reported her concerns to medical staff. Despite her repeated requests for medical tests — and despite a history of breast cancer in her family — Chapman was not given a mammogram until 1994, when the lumps were actually visibly protruding from her right breast.

More than eight months later, a biopsy was finally taken, and it confirmed breast cancer. Nearly 10 years after she first reported her concerns, Chapman had a mastectomy of her right breast.

Chapman’s struggle with her health — and with the prison medical care system — didn’t end there. Throughout 1996, Chapman complained of pain and vaginal blood clots, as well as the persistent lumps in her left breast. In January 1997, surgeons finally removed Chapman’s left breast, but waited until late 1997 to treat her worsening uterine pain. By that point, Chapman’s diagnosis was uterine cancer, necessitating a hysterectomy.

The resulting lawsuit, Chapman vs. Maddock, alleges serious indifference to the medical needs of the prisoners, asserting that Chapman’s current physical condition is a direct result of prison policies. MoJo Wire’s request to interview Chapman by telephone was denied as a result of a statewide ban on inmate-media interviews.

Pierson of LSPC reports that Chapman has lost weight and is in continuous pain, and says that the prison staff refuse to provide her with anything stronger than Tylenol or Motrin. Lt. Sebald, who handles media inquiries for the prison, said he was not able to comment on her case or her current well-being.

According to Pierson, Chapman has not been given her prescription for Tamoxifen, a breast cancer treatment and prevention drug, for several months. “She’s tired,” says Pierson of her client. “She doesn’t want the lawsuit to go away, but she’s tired of the daily battles.”


previous   next

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.