U.S. may escalate bombing of Iraq

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It appears that some members of the Clinton administration just can’t rest easy unless the US is dropping bombs on at least one impoverished and defenseless, yet defiant, foe. According to the NEW YORK TIMES, senior administration officials are considering escalating the bombing of Iraq, which has been occurring on a constant basis for the past eight months. THE TIMES reports that American and British planes have fired some 1,100 missiles against 359 targets in Iraq this year.

On Tuesday, the Iraqi news agency reported that several people were wounded when missiles struck a fourth century monastery outside the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. The victims were reportedly gathered to watch the solar eclipse. The Department of Defense confirmed that US planes had come under fire that day, and attacked two targets near Mosul in response. A Department spokesman said the church had not been one of the targets hit. He was confident that the Iraqi report was false, because “Saddam is a characteristic liar.”

http://www.nytimes.com/library/…

JB

_
Kansas schools gut evolution standard

Aug. 12, 1999

THE KANSAS CITY STAR reports on the Kansas State Board of Education’s decision to delete key aspects of the theory of evolution from the state’s science standards. Under the new regulations, Kansas science teachers will no longer be required to teach their students about “macroevolution” — the process by which one species evolves into another. This concept forms the basis of the theory that all organisms share a common origin. Students will still be required to learn about changes within species via natural selection.

Critics of the change fear it will open the door for teaching Creationism — which explains the origins of life according to the book of Genesis — in Kansas “science” classrooms. According to the ASSOCIATED PRESS Kansas Governor Bill Graves called the Board’s action “a terrible, tragic, embarrassing solution to a problem that didn’t exist.”

http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/…

JB

_
Can you be too feminist?

Aug. 11, 1999

Yep, say the administrators of Boston College.

Radical feminist professor Mary Daly had said she would rather resign than accept men in her classes after the Jesuit school’s administrators told her she had to. Boston College officials assumed she meant what she said, so when she came back to campus for the new school year her office door’s locks had been changed and her name and courses expunged from the college’s class schedule. Sexist jerks — taking a woman at her word.

Daly, who has fought this battle many times before, told NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO that having men in her feminist theory classes made it difficult for her women students to think straight. In a class with men, women students feel they “have to be sexy, and they can’t really think.”This is feminism?

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/…

BSB

_
Study: Legal abortion reduces crime

Aug. 10, 1999

An unpublished study may give abortion-rights activists a surprising new reason to fight to keep Roe vs. Wade intact. But the reason may be as controversial as the abortion issue itself. A Stanford law professor and University of Chicago economist have concluded that the legalization of abortion in the 1970s may be responsible for the precipitous drop in crime rates in the 1990s, says the SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS. Relying on studies indicating that unwanted children are more likely to grow up to commit crimes, the researchers suggest that the legalization of abortion reduced the sheer number of potential criminals. Even when controlling for other factors such as the economy, the researchers conclude that legalized abortion may account for as much as half of the reduction in crime over the past 20 years.

The explanation has activists on the right and the left screaming, well, bloody murder. The study’s critics argue that such a conclusion smacks of racism and eugenics. Researchers defend the study, pointing out that their conclusion is only about planned pregnancies and has nothing to do with class and race.

http://www.mercurycenter.com/breaking/docs/008962.htm

LS

_
Puerto Rico to Navy: Get out of Vieques

Aug. 9, 1999

Residents of the small Puerto Rican island of Vieques are fed up with the US Navy — and they’re not the only ones. The July issue of THE VIEQUES TIMES announces proudly that “‘Navy Out of Vieques’ is now officially the public policy of the Puerto Rican government.” According to the paper, the governor has accepted recommendations made by his Vieques Commission, including an “immediate and permanent cease and desist of all Navy activities” on the island, and the return of Navy-possessed lands to the people of Vieques. The United States has operated a bombing range on the island since World War II, and admitted to using both depleted uranium and napalm there in recent years.

Opposition to the Naval presence there has grown since last April, when a bomb missed its target by more than a mile and killed a civilian security guard and wounded four others. In fact, last week Puerto Rico’s attorney general threatened to sue the Navy if it continues to use the island for bombing runs, saying the US military branch is violating clear air, endangered species, and hazardous waste laws. Meanwhile, the Navy insists the site is the only place where its Atlantic fleet forces can train simultaneously with live ammunition. A panel is investigating the issue and will report its findings to President Clinton later this year.

http://www.viequestimes.com/index.htm/latest.htm

j.r.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate