Heads it’s murder, tails it’s manslaughter

In an act of judicial recklessness that would make an LAPD gang unit blush, a Kentucky jury recently decided the fate of an accused murderer by tossing a coin. The Louisville, Ky. COURIER-JOURNAL reports on the case of Phillip J. Givens II, who was convicted of murdering his girlfriend by a Jefferson County jury. The judge declared a mistrial Monday when he discovered how the jury reached its verdict.

The jury had deadlocked on whether Givens should be convicted of murder or the lesser charge of manslaughter. Ten of the jurors were willing to compromise, but one was unwilling to budge on manslaughter and another was firmly for murder. Apparently unaware of the term “hung jury,” the 12 impatient jurors decided to settle the dispute by flipping a silver dollar. Word of the coin flip leaked to a court employee, who informed the judge. Had the conviction stood, Givens could have received a maximum of life in prison.

“It kind of blows your mind,” Givens’ lawyer said. “I think they had a lapse in judgment, and I’d like to think it doesn’t go on very often.”

To ensure that it doesn’t, the Circuit Court will now reportedly require at least a best-of-seven series to resolve deadlocks.


It's been a tough several weeks for those who care about the truth: Congress, the FBI, and the judiciary are seemingly more concerned with providing cover for a foregone conclusion than with uncovering facts.

But we also saw something incredibly powerful: that truth-tellers don't quit, and that speaking up is contagious. I hope you'll read why, even now, we believe the truth will prevail—and why we aren't giving up on our goal of raising $30,000 in new monthly donations this fall, even though there's a long way to go to get there. Please help close the gap with a tax-deductible donation today.