Corruption Tsunami

From small towns to Washington D.C., America is awash in political payoff scandals. Mokhiber and Weissman take you on the tour.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


We ran into Charles Korb the other day.

Korb is the president of the Committee for Economic Development, a group of major American corporate executives who want campaign finance reform. They propose banning soft-money contributions to national political parties, increasing individual contribution limits to $3,000 per candidate, and implementing a system of partial public funding that matches individual donations of up to $200 on a two-to-one basis.

Korb and the corporate executives at CED don’t mind big business running roughshod over the political system — just as long as it isn’t overtly corrupt or perceived as corrupt. “A vibrant and well-functioning business system will not remain viable in an environment of real or perceived corruption,” said a CED report released last year on the subject.

Korb conceded that if soft money was banned, corporations would simply shift the cash into their inside-the-beltway Washington lobby operations. And that was fine with him. The companies are sick of being shaken down by every two-bit politician offering to defend this or that corporate interest. And Korb and his colleagues rightly fear that the growing appearance of corruption will undermine public confidence in the corporate system.

Korb has reason to be worried. A veritable tsunami of corruption is crashing over the countryside. There is, first and foremost, the endless amount of soft-money cash flowing from corporate coffers into federal campaigns and national political parties. Whether this cash is buying favors is beside the point — it appears to be buying favors, and that’s what is worrying Korb.

Potentially more dangerous is the real corruption that is exploding at the state and local levels. Washington’s culture of corruption is sending the message that political payola is OK — and the country is responding.

Let’s take the tour:

In Illinois, Governor George Ryan is fighting for his political life. Federal investigators allege that under Ryan’s tenure as Secretary of State, the state issued driver’s licenses to truckers and other drivers in exchange for cash payments that went into a political slush fund for Ryan. Several of those drivers ended up in fatal highway accidents. A number of government officials have been indicted, and federal prosecutors are gunning for the governor.

In California, Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush is under fire from consumer groups and the state’s largest newspaper, The Los Angeles Times, for shielding State Farm and two other insurance companies from $3.37 billion in fines in exchange for $10.75 million in contributions to non-profit organizations and to Quackenbush’s own political committees.

In Oklahoma earlier this month, federal officials alleged that the state Health Department’s deputy commissioner solicited bribes from nursing home owners in exchange for regulatory favors and used at least a portion of the payoffs to gamble on horse races.

According to a report in the Daily Oklahoman, FBI agents arrested Brent VanMeter at his office after he allegedly picked up payoff money from an Oklahoma nursing home owner. VanMeter was charged with one count of soliciting a bribe. VanMeter’s attorney said his client plans to plead not guilty.

The Governor of Oklahoma, Frank Keating, called the health department scandal “an issue of raw, unadulterated corruption.”

Keating and CED’s Korb are trying to protect the corporate system — stamp out obvious forms of corruption and overt appearances, the better to let corporations rule.

Corruption is debilitating to any democracy. But a system where giant corporations wield tremendous power over ordinary citizens is an open invitation to corruption. In addition to criminally prosecuting illegal bribery and outlawing legalized bribery, we must also fundamentally question the nature of the corporate beast.

Should a corporation, a public creation, be free to gain unlimited power and wield that power over our democracy? Should corporations be allowed to have free speech rights — the same as living, breathing human beings?

The City Council of the northern California community of Point Arena had it right last month when it voted four-to-one to publicly side with Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black’s 1938 opinion, in which Black stated, “I do not believe the word ‘person’ in the 14th Amendment includes corporations.”

The people of Point Arena were critical of the US Supreme Court — Justice Black excepted — for bestowing free speech, lobbying, and propaganda rights on corporations.

“Corporations enjoy privileges that real people do not. Corporations have become super people,” the resolution read. “Corporations have effectively become our governors. Today workers must check their personhood and natural rights at the gate as they enter corporate property. But the corporation remains a person and asserts its power wherever it goes.”

“There has been no real challenge to corporate power for 100 years,” the people of Point Arena said. “Revoking corporate personhood is a logical and vital step in the process of controlling our country and community.”

Now there’s a sentiment Korb and Keating might have a difficult time getting their corporate patrons to support.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate