Dick’s Defeat




Might Dick Cheney’s days of stonewalling be coming to an end? Might the Wyoming oilman-turned-Halliburton boss-turned-Vice President finally be foreced to admit how deeply he let his buddies in the energy industry influence the findings of his 2000 federal energy policy task force?

Maybe. Maybe not. And maybe it doesn’t really matter.

Last week, those who hope that Cheeny’s day of reckoning is approaching were given reason to celebrate as a federal appeals court rejected the Bush administration’s latest attempt to evade a federal judge’s order calling for the disclosure of records related to the task force. That order, handed down by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, would clear the way for two groups — Judicial Watch and The Sierra Club — to get information on who Cheney met with while developing his energy plan.

The administration now has two choices — honor the 2002 ruling and turn over the documents or take the matter to the Supreme Court. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told The Washignton Post that he hopes Cheney will finally come clean.

    “‘The vice president has been told by multiple courts that he is not above the law,’ Fitton said. ‘Perhaps now he will give up his legal stonewalling and begin complying with court orders to turn over his secret energy task force documents.'”

Of course, while the fight over how Cheney developed his plan is being slowly resolved in the courts, many of the policies he proposed are close to becoming law. With both the House and Senate having passed some version of an energy bill, Republican leaders have declared that they intend to push a GOP energy plan through to the president’s desk with or without the cooperation of their Democratic counterparts. As Bill Wicker, a spokesman for Democrats on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, told The New York Times, “It is an optical illusion that Democrats are involved.”

    “‘To this point, they have not sought involvement of Democrats at all,’ said Representative Henry A. Waxman, Democrat of California and a member of the conference committee that is supposed to reconcile the House and Senate energy bills. ‘The Republicans are talking among themselves.'”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.