Complications

The Bush administration finds it a bit “complicated” to support our troops in combat.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In his convention speech, John Kerry said, “I know there are those who criticize me for seeing complexities — and I do — because some issues just aren’t all that simple.” On the campaign trail, George Bush fired back with his oft-used line, “There’s nothing complicated about supporting our troops in combat!”

Is that so? Back in 2003, Bush sounded like he had some pretty complicated reasons for threatening to veto the $87 billion Iraq spending bill:

The Bush administration threatened for the first time Tuesday to veto an $87 billion package for Iraq and Afghanistan if Congress converts any Iraqi rebuilding money into loans…

“Including a loan mechanism slows efforts to stabilize the region and to relieve pressure on our troops, raises questions about our commitment to building a democratic and self-governing Iraq, and impairs our ability to encourage other nations to provide badly needed assistance without saddling Iraq with additional debt,” the letter [from the White House] said.

While we’re at it, can someone please tell Paul Wolfowitz that there’s nothing complicated about supporting troops in combat:

MR. RUSSERT: But why is it that we had 600,000 troops for the Persian Gulf War to remove Saddam from Kuwait, when we only have 300,000 to take over all of Iraq?

MR. WOLFOWITZ: It’s a long and complicated answer, but I think the simplest part of it is what I have just said. If we had waited to put 600,000 troops in place, we would have lost all elements of surprise. (Meet the Press, 4/6/03)

Make sure Donald Rumsfeld gets the memo, too:

RUMSFELD: The system works. There were some allegations of abuse in a detention facility in Iraq. It was reported in the chain of command. Immediately it was announced to the public. Immediately an investigation was initiated. I recognise the appetite of people for instant information and instant conclusions. These things are complicated. (Congressional testimony on Abu Ghraib, (5/5/04)

DONALD RUMSFELD: In a long, hard war, we’re going to have tragic days, as this is. But they’re necessary. They’re part of a war that’s difficult and complicated. (Press conference after 15 soldiers die in Iraq, (11/03/03)

Halliburton, of course, should be informed:

‘Under these conditions no one should expect that assembling such complicated logistics would be the epitome of pristine perfection,’ said Alfred Neffgen, KBR chief operating officer for the Americas. (Explaining financial mismanagement in Iraq, (7/22/04)

And of course, CC Condoleeza Rice:

DR. RICE: Well, look, Ahmed Chalabi did, I think, a lot of good work on behalf of his country when he was in exile. And, yes, there was a relationship. It has not been an easy relationship of late — I think that you can see that, that’s not hard to see. But Iraq is a complicated place and we’re going to continue to work with whomever we need to in that complicated place. (Press Briefing, 6/1/04)

As it turns out, maybe things do get a little complicated when it comes to: vetoing funds for Iraq, understaffing the occupation force, failing to investigate torture allegations, letting soldier casualties rise, wasting taxpayer money, and hob-nobbing with con-men. Glad we cleared that up.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate