Cartoongate Continues at College


The editor of the University of Illinois student paper, The Daily Illini, was recently fired for republishing the controversial Mohammed cartoons. Accusing the board of setting a “bad precedent,” Acton Gordon called the cartoons newsworthy and stood by his decision to act quickly and publish them. “We had a news story on our hands, with violence erupting about imagery, but you can’t show it because of a taboo, because of a taboo that’s not a Western taboo but a Muslim taboo?” he said. “That’s a blow to journalism.”

And he’s right. While almost every newspaper in America refused to print the cartoons, including The New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, an editor in the most free and democratic nation in the world should be able to exercise his right to disseminate information. In this instance, censoring the University of Illinois from seeing the cartoons for fear of the repercussions, assumes the worst of its Muslim students. Gordon should be able to exercise his First Amendment rights, especially when publishing a cartoon that the world is both transfixed upon and retaliating against.

Gordon is planning to sue the University of Illinois, and has retained the services of Junaid Afeef, a Muslim attorney, who while deeply offended by the cartoons, does not believe that free speech can only be adopted when suitable.

Meanwhile, at the University of California Berkeley, the California Patriot, the campus’ conservative newspaper—yes, they have one—also published the two cartoons this week. Claiming to publish the cartoons “in solidarity with the Muslim people,” the Patriot missed the boat by picking up the story so late. The cartoons are accompanied by an op-ed, claiming that “being offended occasionally is the price of living in a diverse, tolerant, pluralistic society.” That is correct. And on the Berkeley campus that is exactly the way it was handled, as Muslim Student Association thanked “the Muslim community in standing in solidarity and … not engaging in such provocative methods, but by aiming to educate and utilizing the situation to help spread the beautiful word of Islam.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.