Is Bush Finally Getting Serious About Loose Nukes?

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.


Like Michael Crowley, I’ve been continually stunned by the fact that officials in the Bush administration appear to care very little about all the loose nuclear material floating around the world.

I’m generally of the opinion that the possibility of another low-level terrorist attack in the United States on the scale of, say, the London bus bombings, while tragic, shouldn’t be among the country’s highest concerns. We’re never going to be able to prevent every minor attack, a few bombs aren’t going to bring down the republic, and anyway, there really are more pressing problems out there (global warming, say). But there’s one big exception here—a nuclear attack wiping out an American city would be unimaginably catastrophic, and the government really should do everything in its power to prevent nuclear materials from falling into the wrong hands. But the administration’s progress on this front has been absolutely dismal, despite the fact that this stuff isn’t terribly difficult to accomplish.

So it’s very good news that President Bush and Vladimir Putin are now “announc[ing] a new global program to track potential nuclear terrorists, detect and lock up bomb-making materials and coordinate their responses if terrorists obtain a weapon.” Obviously I’d like to know the details here, and whether they’ve taken all the steps advocated by, say, the Nuclear Threat Initiative—and whether words will translate into action, etc.—but this looks like progress. I’d ask why it took the administration five years to get around to this, but maybe we can leave aside carping for now.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate