Women Attack Street “Admirer” in NYC


The New York Times had a story recently about an altercation that occurred in the West Village after a man made harassing comments to a group of women walking past him on the street. If you take it from the Times, 28-year-old Dwayne Buckle merely said, “Hey, how’re you doing?” to one of the women, and then was attacked by the group and stabbed in the stomach with a steak knife.

But unlike the Times, which relied on Buckle’s side of the story, the New York Daily News interviewed police and others who were at the scene. Turns out it the fight probably wasn’t caused by a violent response to a “harmless” catcall, but by an anti-gay comment and threat. (The women were reportedly lesbians.)

“He called us [homophobic slur] and he said he was going to f- us all,” one of the women said hours later as cops led the seven suspects out of the 6th Precinct stationhouse.

“He spit on us and threw a cigarette,” another woman said. “This is a hate crime.”

Buckle, though, claims he was the victim of a hate crime.

“It was a hate crime against a straight man by a ton of lesbians,” he said. “This is what the world is coming to.”

It’s clear that there’s probably more to this story than the Times reported. No matter what Buckle really said to the women (I’m willing to bet, homophobic or not, that it was more offensive than “How’re you doing?”), violence was not an acceptable answer. But it’s easy to understand how a group of women walking at 2 a.m. could feel threatened by harassing comments from a man on the street. And the Times’ headline was absolutely inexcusable: “Man Is Stabbed in Attack After Admiring a Stranger.”

After reading the Daily News‘ quotes from the women, and having been on the receiving end of some “admiring” comments on the street myself, I think the Times‘ headline writers should have chosen a more accurate verb. Like “catcalling.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.