Stuck on the Terrorist Watchlist


If you’re falsely accused of being a terrorist, what happens to you once you’re freed? It depends on what country you’re dealing with. Apparently, Canada will apologize and give you millions of dollars, but the U.S. will deny any wrongdoing and threaten to arrest you if you set foot in the country.

On Friday, Canada gave Maher Arar an $8.9 million settlement, legal fees, and an official apology for its role in his wrongful detention and torture. Canada had previously provided information which led to the United States’ 2002 arrest of Maher, a Syrian-born Canadian. Arar was renditioned to Syria, where he was tortured, forced into false confessions, and eventually released. Last year, Canada’s public inquiry cleared Arar of wrongdoing. The U.S., however, has kept Arar on its no-fly list and terrorist watchlist.

The squabble shows that “Canada and the U.S. are on fundamentally different paths when it comes to matters of terrorism and human rights,” according to the Toronto Star. But it’s not just Canada — leaders from other U.S. ally states are questioning their own involvement in the United States’ extraordinary rendition program.

Domestically, Dems are finally on the attack, asking why the Bush administration won’t admit to mistakes like Arar’s arrest — and why we’re rendering suspects to countries like Syria at all. Here’s Sen. Patrick Leahy to Alberto Gonzales at last week’s judiciary committee hearing (yup, the same one where Gonzales argued the Constitution didn’t guarantee the right of habeas corpus):

LEAHY: Why was he sent to Syria instead of Canada?…We knew damn well, if he went to Canada, he wouldn’t be tortured. He’d be held. He’d be investigated. We also knew damn well, if he went to Syria, he’d be tortured. And it’s beneath the dignity of this country, a country that has always been a beacon of human rights, to send somebody to another country to be tortured.

Gonzales dodged the question. So what’s the answer to this and other questions about Arar’s extraordinary rendition? It looks like Canadian Prime Minster Stephen Harper was correct when he said “we simply have a U.S. government that won’t admit it’s wrong.”

LISTEN: Click here to listen to Gonzales and Leahy’s exchange.

THANK YOU.

We recently wrapped up the crowdfunding campaign for our ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project, and it was a smashing success. About 10,364 readers pitched in with donations averaging $45, and together they contributed about $467,374 toward our $500,000 goal.

That's amazing. We still have donations from letters we sent in the mail coming back to us, so we're on pace to hit—if not exceed—that goal. Thank you so much. We'll keep you posted here as the project ramps up, and you can join the hundreds of readers who have alerted us to corruption to dig into.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.