The Petraeus/Crocker Report: Let the Liveblogging Begin!


12:20 PM: General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker will be testifying before a joint hearing of the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs Committees starting in a few minutes. Mother Jones is providing full coverage, with reporters on the scene and live updates right here at MoJoBlog. Newspapers around the country have already reported the bulk of what Petraeus will say. Lead item: Petraeus plans to ask for another Friedman unit before making a decision about withdrawing troops.

12:35: The hearing just started, with some members of the audience being escorted out immediately. Of course. Ike Skelton asked “Are they gone?” before continuing.

12:36: Mr. Skelton reminds us that this is one of the “most important hearings” of the year. That’s the kind of hard-hitting analysis we’re looking forward to today.

12:39: Mr. Skelton is already within a few seconds of breaking the “5-minute rule” he called for just 5 minutes ago. Because we’ve been waiting six months for the Skelton report.

12:44: By 5 minutes, he meant 10. At least he’s not as tone-deaf as MoveOn.org, which called Petraeus “General Betray Us” in an ad published in the Times today.

12:46: Tom Lantos, the Foreign Affairs chairman, takes his turn. It’s worth noting that he has two son-in-laws. They’re named Dick Swett and Timber Dick. Really.

12:48: First reference to “ammo dumps.” Worth noting.

12:49: Lantos says we can’t take anything the administration says about Iraq “at face value.” He doesn’t “buy” the idea that victory is at hand.

12:51: Lantos joins the chorus of voices attacking Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. He calls him a “front man for Shiite partisans,” and accusing him of being aligned with “notorious militias, death squads, and sectarian thugs.”

12:54: Lantos: “We are wrecking our military… and limiting our ability to address our global military needs.”

12:56: Duncan Hunter is the first Republican to speak. He says Democrats have been attacking Petraeus’ credibility. Also he says that he “knows” that Petraeus’ testimony hasn’t been written by political operatives, even though multiple news reports have said that the testimony has been put together by the White House. That’s one!

1:00: Difficulty with the facts number two: Duncan Hunter is the first Republican to claim that progress in Anbar Province is related to the surge. This is not the case.

1:02: First Reagan reference! Who had 1:02 in the pool?

1:03: Hunter compares Petraeus to Eisenhower, too. Is Petraeus going to run for president? Our own Dan Schulman investigates.

1:07: Ileana Ros-Lehtinen trusts Petraeus’ “reporting.”

1:10: More on the MoveOn ad from Ros-Lehtinen. It could be backfiring.

1:11: First Neville Chamberlain reference.

1:15: Petraeus takes the floor. The acoustics in here are “not good at all,” Skelton warns. Then someone asks where the statement is. “It should be passed out by now,” Skelton says.

1:16: Brian Williams on MSNBC said that the Commander of U.S. forces in Iraq is powerless in the face of a broken microphone.

1:17: Another person is removed for “making a disturbance.” “Is it fixed?”

1:18: Where’s Petraeus’ statement? Is it with the Weapons of Mass Destruction?

1:19: Skelton can’t find Burton. Burton recommends being very firm in geting them out of here. “i still see them out there. “Who’s speaking?” “This is a very important hearing!”

1:20: “That really pisses me off, dammit.” Skelton doesn’t know that we can hear him cursing.

1:23: It’ll take 5 minutes to fix the microphone. Good enough for government work.

Go to Part Two.

—Nick Baumann

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.