Geraldine Ferraro: Obama Is Lucky to Be Black

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


ferraro-clinton.jpg Campaigns make people say crazy things. Here’s Clinton surrogate Geraldine Ferraro:

If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.

Hat tip Kos, where DHinMI has some interesting thoughts:

Geraldine Ferraro–nominated as Vice President almost entirely because she was a woman–ridiculing Barack Obama’s rise as supposedly due to his race is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

One can laugh at the ridiculousness of the statement, or ridicule the idea that African-Americans somehow have it easier in America than white men or women. But to do so misses how Ferraro’s statement will be heard by too many Americans.

The fact is, there are a lot of White people in American who believe they’re at a disadvantage, that Blacks get things handed to them. The idea may be foreign to some people, but I’ve heard it my entire life. I’ve heard it at family gatherings, in my neighborhood when I was a kid, from family friends and all kinds of other folks. It’s not a fringe belief.

In a contest between minorities traditionally closed out of the political process, it’s inevitable that tensions like the ones displayed here (“It’s harder being female!” “No, it’s harder being black!”) will arise. But Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have said, in very high profile moments, that they are thrilled with the historic nature of the race, and will continue to be thrilled by it even if they don’t win the nomination. Remember Clinton saying that she was “honored, honored” to share a stage with Obama? For some reason, only the surrogates can’t see the forest for the partisan trees.

Update: Howard Wolfson, communications director for Senator Clinton’s campaign, responds: “We disagree with her.”

FACT:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2020 demands.

payment methods

FACT:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2020 demands.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate