Why Democrats Are Promoting Gingrich’s Worries Regarding the 2008 Elections

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee–the Democratic Party entity responsible for supporting House candidates–is happy that Newt Gingrich is not happy. On Tuesday, it zapped around a piece that Gingrich wrote for the conservative Human Events magazine, in which he cited the Democrat’s recent win in a congressional special election in Louisiana as one helluva warning for the Republican party. Gingrich wrote:

Saturday’s loss was in a district that President Bush carried by 19 percentage points in 2004 and that the Republicans have held since 1975.

This defeat follows on the loss of Speaker Hastert’s seat in Illinois. That seat had been held by a Republican for 76 years with the single exception of the 1974 Watergate election when the Democrats held it for one term. That same seat had been carried by President Bush 55-44% in 2004.

Gingrich notes that congressional Democrats lead congressional Republicans in generic polling by 18 points nowadays, “reminiscent of the depths of the Watergate disaster.” And bashing Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton ain’t gonna help the GOPers running for House and Senate seats:

The Republican brand has been so badly damaged that if Republicans try to run an anti-Obama, anti-Reverend Wright, or (if Senator Clinton wins), anti-Clinton campaign, they are simply going to fail.

This model has already been tested with disastrous results.

In 2006, there were six incumbent Republican Senators who had plenty of money, the advantage of incumbency, and traditionally successful consultants.

But the voters in all six states had adopted a simple position: “Not you.” No matter what the GOP Senators attacked their opponents with, the voters shrugged off the attacks and returned to, “Not you.”

So with congressional Republicans facing a possible “catastrophic election this fall,” what’s a GOPer to do? They must, Gingrich declares, “chart a bold course of real change.” What would that “real change” entail? Gingrich has a list of nine items, including a gas tax holiday (isn’t that old news already?), a moratorium on earmarks (which individually can be quite popular back home in the district), cutting the budget of the Census Bureau (an issue on the mind of so many Americans), implementing a spaced-based GPS-style air traffic control system (a good idea, or Beam me up, Scotty?), declare English the official language of government (which will surely help the party with Hispanic voters), and “remind Americans that judges matter” (for, obviously, most Americans have forgotten that).

Well, let’s just say that Gingrich is better on the diagnosis than on the prescription. Which is why Democratic political operatives are delightfully promoting his worries about the upcoming election.


We recently wrapped up the crowdfunding campaign for our ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project, and it was a smashing success. About 10,364 readers pitched in with donations averaging $45, and together they contributed about $467,374 toward our $500,000 goal.

That's amazing. We still have donations from letters we sent in the mail coming back to us, so we're on pace to hit—if not exceed—that goal. Thank you so much. We'll keep you posted here as the project ramps up, and you can join the hundreds of readers who have alerted us to corruption to dig into.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.