Capping Executive Pay on Wall Street: McCain Takes the Lead?

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


The idea of capping executive pay on Wall Street is really catching on. You would think the strongest measure on that front would be found in the version of the bailout proposed by Democrat Chris Dodd. Actually, it’s coming from… John McCain?

Dodd is proposing to penalize executives who take “inappropriate or excessive” risks. The executive compensation and severance packages could be reduced if that is “in the public interest,” the proposal says. It would also force executives to give back profits they earned that were based on company accounting measures that are later found to be inaccurate.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain, who has supported giving shareholders a bigger say in executive compensation in the past, said today that taxpayers shouldn’t foot the bill for “golden parachutes” for officers of companies that have crumbled in upheaval on Wall Street.

“The senior executives of any firm that is bailed out by Treasury should not be making more than the highest paid government official,” McCain said at a campaign event in Scranton, Pennsylvania.

The president is the highest paid federal official, with a salary of $400,000 a year.

McCain is really, really committed to this new populist, foe-of-Wall Street posture. And, for what it’s worth, take a second to reflect on how quickly and how fundamentally the economic meltdown has changed the political landscape in this country — the two parties are competing to see who can twist the screws tighter on Wall Street fat cats. Did you think even six months ago that such a scenario was possible in this country?

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate