VP Debate: Working Moms For Palin? Not These 400


Many of the 400 working mothers who watched the VP debate in a San Francisco hotel ballroom live Thursday night grimaced as Sarah Palin leaned awkwardly into Joe Biden onstage, then sailed over to her podium. “After all, this is a historic night for working moms,” noted the work/life conference wrangler. Not even the many liberals in attendance wanted her to fail outright. Thus, there was a collective groan at Palin’s first response to Gwen Ifill: “You know, I think a good barometer here, as we try to figure out has this been a good time or a bad time in America’s economy, is go to a kid’s soccer game on Saturday, and turn to any parent there on the sideline and ask them, “How are you feeling about the economy?”

These parents know when they’re being pandered to. The faint charms of Palin’s mommy group charisma, her overuse of the word ‘darn’? Oh, how the shine has worn off. There were catcalls at Palin’s use of the phrase “respect for women’s rights.” Cheers when Biden finally took off the kid gloves.

“I’m a registered Democrat, and I have to admit, the first time I saw her speak I was nervous,” said a redhead named Kacy, standing near the open bar and the cupcake table after the first hour of the debate. “She seemed witty and strong.” Kacy adjusted the sleeping one-month-old on her shoulder. “But now that I’ve seen her speak more, I’ve lost my admiration for her,” she said.

A blonde at the book table, by titles “Porn for New Moms” and “The Three-Martini Playdate,” planned to watch the recorded debate at home with a Palin Bingo card in hand and another glass of wine. “Really, it’s just like any other reality show, isn’t it? Two people looking like idiots on TV?”

After an hour of Palin and Biden, star work/life speaker Lisa Belkin took a vote. Option one, “watching the rest of the debate,” lost by a few cheers in favor of extended panels on blending life and work. They’d TiVoed it. They knew what they were missing in the Veep debate—and what they weren’t.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.