Kennedy, Byrd, and Assorted Reflections

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


The pair of medical emergencies at today’s inaugural luncheon reminds me of one of the lessons you learn if you live in Washington for even a little while: when living in this city and following politics closely, it’s easy to forget the humanity that lies behind all the partisanship and power plays. Ted Kennedy’s seizure and Robert Byrd’s reported removal for unknown reasons should bring to mind these men’s accomplishments and produce a concern for their well-being. I’ll admit that my first reactions were: (1) big news! and (2) holy cow, Obama is drifting dangerously afield of that all-important 60-vote mark.

Those are awful responses, and the people who end their careers in this city beloved by their peers (think Tim Russert) are the ones who suppress them. They’re political junkies like the rest of us, of course. But they never forget that big shots in this town, hard as it may be to recognize sometimes, are people, too. They keep in touch because they care about people, not because they want to network. They help out up-and-comers because they genuinely want to share the success they themselves experience. When they retire or pass away, all of the people who lived by a different set of values wax poetic, with a twinge of regret.

So in the spirit of people like that, let’s wish Kennedy and Byrd all the best. They are both titans of the Senate. Kennedy’s professional history is packed with big fights that he fought for little people. Few in the history of the country have done more for working Americans than him. Let’s hope he lives long enough to see universal health care a reality. Byrd I can speak less glowingly about, particularly because he seems have seen the federal government primarily as a cash machine for his native West Virginia. But he’s a fighter, and hopefully he finds peace.

If you are interested in the political implications, this is my understanding of what happens if Barack Obama tries to push legislation through the Senate tomorrow. Roland Burris has been sworn in. Hillary Clinton is still a senator because she has not yet been confirmed and has not yet resigned. Now-former Senator Ken Salazar was confirmed as Secretary of the Interior today (along with a few other cabinet members), and it is unclear if his replacement, Michael Bennet, has been sworn in. That means that of the 59 Democrats and independents who caucus with the Democrats, three people will definitely be missing — Kennedy, Byrd, and the all-but-official Al Franken — and one, Bennet, will possibly be missing.

Is 55 or 56 votes substantially worse than 59? It depends on the bill, of course. But at the moment, let’s put aside our concerns. Obama is working awfully hard to ensure that gobs of Republicans sign on to all of his major moves. He reportedly wanted 80 votes on the stimulus bill, which, if he meets that target, will mean roughly 25 supportive Republicans. And besides, there are people in the hospital. Let’s wait a few minutes before doing more than a paragraph’s worth of political analysis.

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate