Copyright Smackdown: AP Goes After Shepard Fairey

Image created with a little help from <a href="http://obamiconme.pastemagazine.com/">Obamicon.me</a>. Copyright symbol from <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e1/Copyright-serif.svg/354px-Copyright-serif.svg.png">Wikimedia</a>


Via the Associated Press, we learn that the Associated Press is coming after Shepard Fairey for using one of its photos as the basis of his (everyone say it with me!) iconic Obama “Hope” poster. A few weeks ago, a diligent photographer finally ID’d the poster’s source image as a shot taken in 2006 by an AP freelancer. The AP is now crying copyright infringement and says it has “reached out to Mr. Fairey’s attorney.” (It’s worth noting that when Reuters briefly thought the shot was theirs, they simply asked for credit.) So was Fairey’s unattributed appropriation of the image fair
use? That depends in part on whether the Hope poster was derivative or
transformative (and not just in the political sense). On the derivative
side, even though Fairey’s a design whiz, what he did to the AP image
was not all that tricky. (Photoshop/Illustrator geeks can get the
lowdown here.)
On the transformative side, he altered the original enough that it took
a year to figure out where it came from (though Fairey might have
bothered to note his source in the first place).

Also, Fairey claims he didn’t make any money off the posters, which
were sold to raise money for Obama. And it doesn’t hurt that Fairey’s
lawyer is Anthony Falzone, the head of Stanford’s Fair Use Project and
a colleague of free-culture guru Lawrence Lessig. It looks like the AP is hoping against hope. Maybe it will settle for an autographed poster, now going for as much as $12K on Ebay.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.