The Vacation Card: Officially Played


Earlier today, I wondered whether Sen. Sherrod Brown’s mention of working through August and Nancy Pelosi’s promise to do the same meant the Democrats were going to try playing the vacation card against the Republicans. It’s a great political tool: if your opponents want to delay something (health care, in this instance) until after recess, express your willingness to work through vacation and paint your opponents as lazy. Congressional majorities do it all the time. If that really is the Dems’ new strategy, Jane Hamsher at FireDogLake is helping to set them up:

The Republicans, the Blue Dogs and Joe Lieberman want to stall passing a health care bill, because they know that if members go back to their districts in August it gives the health insurance lobby a chance to hammer them with millions in advertising. There’s one word for that:  unacceptable.  The House should keep working until they pass a health reform bill – health care is more important than vacation.

FDL has a petition asking the House to stay in session to pass health reform. They’ve also put together some facts about what three weeks without health care means for Americans: 

  • 143,250 people will lose their health insurance coverage
  • 53,507 people will file for bankruptcy because they can’t pay their medical bills
  • 1,265 people will die because they lack coverage

Of course, even if a health care bill is passed, many of the most important reforms won’t take affect for years. But talking about the costs of inaction is still important, because they’re real. Not passing a health care bill doesn’t mean things will stay the same. It means things will get worse. That’s probably what President Obama is going to focus on in his press conference tonight: convincing Americans that the status quo is unacceptable. If he can convince Americans that reform has to happen now, he’ll have half the battle won. Then he’ll just have to convince people that his reforms are the right ones.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.