A Lobbyist By Any Other Name Smells Just As Bad


Business Week has an interesting piece this week about the stigma of lobbying in the age of Obama, and how it’s driving lobbyists to rethink how they do business. True to form, some of the industry’s heavy-hitters have found a loophole: they’ve stopped calling themselves lobbyists. Obama pal Tom Daschle is now a “strategist” and “special policy adviser” on health care and finance at Alston & Bird; GOP lobbyist kingpin Ed Gillespie styles his services as “strategic planning,” “message development,” and “crisis management.” The new jargon, of course, means that they don’t have to register or disclose information about their lobbying activities. Sorry, I mean their strategizing activities.

The new terminology is convenient in another way, too: It allows Daschle to play the role of an independent expert on health care rather than someone with a direct financial stake in the legislative battle. For instance, Newsweek recently interviewed him about the issue, describing him only as Obama’s failed nominee for health care czar who is now “watching from the sidelines.” For his part, Daschle coyly noted that he felt “very fortunate to be able to play the role of what I would call a resource to members of Congress and to the White House and to others who are interested in public policy relating to health care.”   

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.