Can Birth Control Use Change Your Career?

Photo: Wikimedia Commons


With all the speculation about what led to the current financial crisis, it’s not surprising that yet another study has linked testosterone with financial risk-taking. But this latest study, an experiment involving MBA students at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University, was a little different. It showed that some men and women had similar testosterone levels, and thus (the study’s authors found) similar levels of risk-aversion.

Women with high testosterone levels were seven times more likely to take risks than women with low testosterone levels. In addition, 90% of female students in the study and 31% of the male students had “low” levels of testosterone, and acted exactly the same in terms of risk-averse fiscal investment.

One thing the study didn’t look into was birth control. Most women’s contraception is hormone based, and research shows that it not only lowers a woman’s testosterone levels while she’s on it: it keeps her testosterone low years after she’s stopped. Theoretically, women who don’t use hormonal contraception will have more testosterone, and as a result, will be less risk-averse than women on the pill. And according to the new University of Chicago study, women with more testosterone are more likely to work in risky environments like an investment bank or trade floor. So maybe if 22% of US women ages 15 to 44 weren’t on the pill, there would be more women working in the financial sector. Or maybe just a lot more accidental pregnancies. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate