The Democrats’ Split Personality Disorder

Photo by flickr user <a href="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1079/978734536_51240fb226_m.jpg">cobalt123</a> used under a <a href="http://www.creativecommons.org">Creative Commons</a> license.


They are the best friends of the health insurance industry. They are fiercest foes of the health insurance industry.

I’m talking about Senate Democrats. On Tuesday afternoon, five Democratic members of the Senate finance committee—Max Baucus, Kent Conrad, Blanche Lincoln, Bill Nelson, and Tom Carper—voted with all ten Republicans on the panel to defeat Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s amendment, which would set up a public health insurance plan to compete with private plans. These Democrats provided the winning margin in the 15-8 vote to kill a measure much dreaded by the health insurance companies. Such firms had plenty of reasons—billions, you might say—to celebrate what this band of Democrats did. On a subsequent vote for a weaker public option amendment offered by Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, Nelson and Carper returned to the Democratic fold and supported it, but Baucus, Conrad and Lincoln again sided with GOPers and defeated it.

At the same time Democratic senators were undermining a key Democratic initiative and helping out the insurance industry, the communications center for the Senate Democrats was zapping out a long email—headlined, “Insurance Companies: Profits Over People”—detailing the evils perpetuated by private health insurance companies:
 

Right now, too many insurance companies put profits over people. They retroactively remove your coverage after you become sick, consider C-sections a pre-existing condition, and use a lack of transparency to fleece consumers while they make record profits. Senate health insurance reform reverses the insurance companies’ misplaced priorities and puts the consumer first.

The press release presented a lengthy list of health insurance industry misdeeds:

* From 2000 to 2007, profits at the 10 largest publicly-traded health insurance companies went up 428 percent.

* CEOs at these companies made an average of $11.9 million in 2007

* In the past nine years, health insurance premiums have more than doubled—a rate three times faster than wage increases.

* Health care firms boosted their lobbying efforts in the second quarter of this year by $133 million, becoming the largest industry spender on lobbying. And Karen Ignagni, the chief lobbyist for the health insurance trade association, made $1.65 million in 2007.

The press release referred to health care horror stories that happened when insurance firms denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions. It noted that health insurance firms dump the sick to increase profits, retroactively cancel policies to avoid paying for health care, flout regulations designed to protect consumers, engage in fraudulent activity, and routinely under-reimburse customers. In other words, they are scum.

So the Senate Democrats need a split screen to convey their view on health insurance companies. Most of them want to beat up on the companies and create a public plan that would place pressure on these firms to lower prices and offer better policies and better service. But a handful of Senate Democrats have opposed that effort and provided bipartisan cover to the preserving the highly profitable prerogatives of the health insurance industry. With five senators—including the committee chairman—voting with the Republicans against the Rockefeller measure, the Democrats lost the opportunity to draw a clear line: the Republicans want to protect this industry; we want to protect you.

On health care reform, the Republicans are united in rejectionism. The Democrats are split. They present a mixed message to the public. And on an issue as complicated and complex as health care, that’s not good political medicine.

You can follow David Corn’s postings and media appearances on Twitter.

 

OUR NEW CORRUPTION PROJECT

The more we thought about how MoJo's journalism can have the most impact heading into the 2020 election, the more we realized that so many of today's stories come down to corruption: democracy and the rule of law being undermined by the wealthy and powerful for their own gain.

So we're launching a new Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption. We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We'll publish what we find as a major series in the summer of 2020, including a special issue of our magazine, a dedicated online portal, and video and podcast series so it doesn't get lost in the daily deluge of breaking news.

It's unlike anything we've done before and we've got seed funding to get started, but we're asking readers to help crowdfund this new beat with an additional $500,000 so we can go even bigger. You can read why we're taking this approach and what we want to accomplish in "Corruption Isn't Just Another Scandal. It's the Rot Beneath All of Them," and if you like how it sounds, please help fund it with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate