Big Ag Looks to Plow Under Senate Climate Bill

Photo from the AFB website.

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


The American Farm Bureau Federation is pointing its pitchforks at the Senate climate bill with a major new lobbying campaign, “Don’t CAP our Future.”

The Farm Bureau has been voicing opposition to climate action since the House passed a bill in June, expressing discontent with the concessions that they helped secure in that bill for agriculture. Now they’re urging members of the agriculture community to oppose the Senate bill—and raising doubts about whether climate change is a concern.

“Activists claim there will be droughts, floods, loss of species and more, if the Senate does not pass the Climate Change bill. But their bill wouldn’t even help the climate,” they argue on their website, instructing members to write letters to their senator. “The fact is politics is driving the need for passage—not facts! The cap-and-trade bill does nothing for Climate Change—it’s simply a tax on U.S. energy that gives other countries a free pass. That’s wrong. This is the kind of policy we ask you to stand against today.”

According to a memo emailed to Farm Bureau members and obtained by Mother Jones, they’re also urging state bureaus to hand-deliver to their senators’ in-state offices farmer-style hats—or, if you prefer, “farmer caps”— bearing a AFB sticker opposing the legislation. They’re also sending starter kits for the campaign to their state affiliates by November 6.

Using the familiar farmer cap and the “Don’t CAP Our Future” message sticker to brand the cap with opposition to the issue, state Farm Bureaus can influence your Senators with a visual impact. The farmer caps plan is designed to be used in the state and multiple events.

In addition, the Bureau has created an “action center” that will be used to target specific senators, a petition that members can sign, and a form letter to send to senators:

The Senate’s cap-and-trade bill is a sweeping measure that will have a negative impact on agriculture by raising production costs and lowering farm income. Agriculture will incur higher fuel, fertilizer and energy costs from this bill. Please vote against this bill.

I am greatly concerned about rising energy costs and what they might do to my farming operation. I depend on abundant and affordable energy not only for operation of vehicles, but also for the costs of fertilizers, irrigation and crop protection tools.

The potential for tremendous harm to U.S. agriculture is real. A number of agricultural sectors and areas of the country will not be able to benefit from offsets in the bill. Not all commodities or areas of the country are able to take advantage of potential offsets. But all of agriculture will suffer from higher production costs.

Please oppose the Senate climate change bill. Thank you for your consideration.

AFB President Bob Stallman has not only pushed for provisions that environmentalists believe would reduce the efficacy of a climate bill, but in written testimony submitted to the Environment and Public Works Committee in July he repeated climate skeptic talking points. From his testimony:

We know that there have been times in the earth’s history when carbon concentrations in the atmosphere were greater, when temperatures have been cooler or warmer—in short, there are any number of variables that probably affect the earth’s climate in ways that we simply don’t know.

The “cap” campaign is just the latest installment of the Farm Bureau’s efforts to throw climate legislation off track.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.