Photo Suppression Bill Back From the Dead, Slaughter Fighting It

Photo by flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/talkradionews/2828106409/">talkradionews</a> used under a <a href="http://www.creativecommons.org">Creative Commons</a> license.


As early as Friday, the Supreme Court could clear the way for the release of dozens of photos of detainee abuse. But Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) are working to make sure the pictures never see the light of day, even if the high court opts not to hear the government’s appeal in ACLU v. Department of Defense.

In June, Lieberman and Graham proposed a law that would specifically preempt the release of photographs depicting detainee abuse by carving out an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). (I explained why that’s such a terrible idea here.) House liberals killed the Lieberman-Graham bill, but now it’s back from the dead. House and Senate conferees have approved language in a Homeland Security appropriations bill that would give the Defense Department the power to suppress essentially any photos of detainee abuse it doesn’t want the public to see.

The ACLU is, needless to say, upset that Congress (with the White House’s support) may undercut FOIA and render meaningless the entire court fight over the photos. “It’s frustrating on many levels,” Jameel Jaffer, the director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, told Mother Jones. “The public has a right to see the photos. They would shed light on questions of accountability. We don’t think that democracies are made stronger when they conceal evidence of their own wrongdoing.”

Jaffer isn’t optimistic about the prospects of stopping the provision this time around. “Barring some groundswell of opposition, this provision will become law,” he says. The ACLU is considering what its options might be if that happens, Jaffer says.

The ACLU still has some reason for hope. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), the chairman of the powerful House Rules Committee, was a key figure in the initial fight against the photo suppression bill, and she could use her powerful position to try to stop the bill again. A spokesman for Slaughter says it’s not over yet, because the “bill is still being hashed out.” He notes that Slaughter “remains opposed to any weakening of FOIA and believes that release of the photos would not harm our standing in the world.” In the face of a White House, Pentagon, and Senate that are unified in their support for suppressing the photos, can one congresswoman make a difference?

MORE HARD-HITTING JOURNALISM

In 2014, before Donald Trump announced his run for president, we knew we had to do something different to address the fundamental challenge facing journalism: how hard-hitting reporting that can hold the powerful accountable can survive as the bottom falls out of the news business.

Being a nonprofit, we started planning The Moment for Mother Jones, a special campaign to raise $25 million for key investments to make Mother Jones the strongest watchdog it can be. Five years later, readers have stepped up and contributed an astonishing $23 million in gifts and future pledges. This is an incredible statement from the Mother Jones community in the face of huge threats—both economic and political—against the free press.

Read more about The Moment and see what we've been able to accomplish thanks to readers' incredible generosity so far, and please join them today. Your gift will be matched dollar for dollar, up to $500,000 total, during this critical moment for journalism.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.