US Chamber of Commerce Takes A Bite out of Apple


A day after Apple became the latest major company to quit the US Chamber of Commerce over its reactionary stance on climate change, Chamber president Tom Donohue went on the offensive, claiming Apple CEO Steve Jobs had “forfeited the opportunity to advance a 21st century approach to climate change.”

Yesterday Donohue sent a pissy letter to Jobs talking up Chamber’s efforts to “tackle climate change in a way that will strengthen our economy” and concluding that “it is a shame that Apple will not be part of our efforts.” As he often does, Donohue emphasised that the Chamber represents “more than 3 million businesses and organizations of every size, sector, and region.” It was as if to say that Apple, and not the Chamber, was on the fringe of the climate issue.

Nothing could be further from the truth. As I reported in detail today, the Chamber has offered few ways for its members to influence its policy work, and that’s especially true in the case of climate change. Interviews with current and former board members reveal that the Chamber’s leadership violated its written rules by pursuing an obstructionist approach to climate legislation without getting a vote of approval from its board or committees. And even the board–made of of huge, often petro-intensive companies–scarcely resembles the overall US business community.

On Monday, Apple’s vice president of worldwide government affairs had sent a letter to the Chamber exhorting Donohue to think different. “We strongly object to the Chamber’s recent comments opposing the EPA’s efforts to regulate greenhouse gases,” she said. “We would prefer that the Chamber take a more productive stance on this critical issue and play a constructive role in addressing the climate crisis.”

So would many environmental groups. Sensing weakness in the nation’s largest business lobby, the Natural Resources Defense Council recently launched print ads and a website asking, “Who does the Chamber represent?” Read today’s investigative piece on the Chamber for some answers.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate