Largest Wind Farm in the United States to be Built in Oregon

Photo by GE

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


If work goes according to plan, 338 new wind turbines will be producing 845 MW of electricity in north-central Oregon by 2012 — making the “Shepherds Flat” wind farm the largest such power plant in the United States.

This is the first time General Electric’s 2.5xl turbines will be used in the US, but 100 of the large turbines (each of the three rotor blades are 100 meters long — about 330 feet) have already logged over a million hours of energy production in Europe and Asia. The wind farm will be owned by New York-based Caithness Energy with the power generated supplying electricity to Southern California Energy customers.

 

 

There’s much to celebrate in the announcement. Most important is the fact that by using wind to produce electricity instead of burning coal, some 1.5 million fewer tons of greenhouse gases will be emitted. Also, according to GE Energy spokeswoman, Milissa Rocker, the new turbines will be made at the company’s Pensacola, Florida, plant. (Previously, all 2.5xls were made in Germany.)

But some features of the wind farm are likely to be more controversial.

As I reported here last month, a recent study by the New Rules Project argued that there are significant benefits to “going local” in energy production, including shorter transmission lines, increased energy efficiency and independence, and the ability to meet state renewable energy portfolio requirements.

Dawn Stover, a science writer who serves on several technical advisory committees for wind projects in Washington state, has written:

“California is already consuming 80% of the wind energy made in the Northwest, which leaves me wondering what will happen when Oregon and Washington phase in their own renewable portfolio requirements. The California Energy Commission is proposing to construct a huge new transmission “collector” line to Oregon, and it’s a one-way highway…”

All of which raises an important, larger question. What tradeoffs are we supporting, albeit unknowingly, in the name of fighting global warming? There will need to be tradeoffs — there always are when large-scale changes occur — but, surely, the decisions should be made democratically and openly.

So, two cheers for the Shepherds Flat Wind Farm. I’m going to hold off on that third one until I know that the Oregon wind farm is the best we can do.

 

Osha Gray Davidson is a contributing blogger at Mother Jones and publisher of The Phoenix Sun, an online magazine reporting on solar power and the environment from the American Southwest. He tweets @thephoenixsun. (This story appeared first in a different form in The Phoenix Sun.)

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. The deadline’s almost here. Please help us reach our $150k membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. The deadline’s almost here. Please help us reach our $150k membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate