Another Senate Hopeful Runs on the Public Option

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


Though the public option’s current prospects for passage in Washington remain dim,  the proposal appears to be turning into a new rallying cry for liberal Senate hopefuls. North Carolina Secretary of State Elaine Marshall, who is looking to challenge Republican Senator Richard Burr, has become one of two Democratic Senate candidates to sign onto a letter from the Progressive Change Campaign Committee urging the Senate to pass the public option through reconciliation in the current reform bill. The other is progressive favorite Bill Halter, who has issued a high-profile primary challenge to Senator Blanche Lincoln in Arkansas.

“She came out early for the public option and believes that a strong public option is probably the best way to expand coverage and keep the cost of health care from coming up,” Marshall campaign consultant Thomas Mills tells Mother Jones. “She continues to believe that this is the best way to handle reform.”

Marshall, in fact, had kicked off her campaign efforts last October by circulating a petition in support of the government-run health plan. Like Halter in Arkansas, Marshall is also something of a Democratic insurgent, having been snubbed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, who chose to support another Democratic candidate—former state senator Cal Cunningham—to run in the primary instead. “At no time did the Senate leadership meet with Secretary Marshall,” said Mills, calling the moving “irresponsible.”

 

But Marshall could also stand to benefit from being the outside challenger. Though Cunningham has generally supported the Democratic reform plan, he has yet to become a vocal advocate for the public option. Marshall, by contrast, has not only endorsed the public plan, but also progressive financial reforms like the Consumer Financial Protection Agency—a regulatory body that would provide robust independent oversight for consumers, if it were passed in its strongest form. She’s an unapologetically progressive candidate in a state where Obama managed to squeak past McCain in 2008*—the same year that liberal groups helped challenger Kay Hagan oust Elizabeth Dole for the state’s other Senate seat. Having secured a comfortable lead over Cunningham, Marshall has already begun to appear on the national radar by receiving the backing of feminist stalwarts like the National Organization for Women. And Marshall’s outspoken views could help her make up for a fundraising gap by exciting the netroots who’ve poured over $1 million so far into Halter’s insurgent campaign.

Such funds and excitement might make for a competitive race in a swing state that still has a broad base of Democratic support. Though Burr still has a double-digit lead over his Democratic challengers, his woefully low approval rating has prompted Public Policy Polling to categorize him as one of the most endangered Republican incumbents, and the North Carolina Democratic Party has already started launching attack ads against the senator. Momentum for an upset could end up building in the state—and Marshall has the real potential to appeal to a broad fundraising base outside of it.

*Correction: The original post had misstated Obama’s margin of victory in 2008.

 

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.