Is Halter Trying to Keep Big Labor at Arm’s Length?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Bill Halter kicked off his Democratic primary challenge to Senator Blanche Lincoln with heavy backing from national labor unions. Now he’s trying to keep his distance from them. On Friday, an independent group called “Arkansas for Change” launched an attack ad against Lincoln that was co-sponsored by a Texas AFL-CIO organizer. The ad hit on many of Halter’s own criticisms of Lincoln, accusing her of “bailing out Wall Street banks—no strings attached” and going soft on consumer financial protection.

Lincoln charged the ad was it was launched by “Halter’s union sponsors.”  But Halter quickly responded that his campaign “has nothing to do with the expenditure ad.” He then tried to disassociate himself from the pledge that the SEIU made in December to help him retire more than $440,000 in campaign debt. The Lincoln campaign has “alleged that the campaign debt has been paid off [by the SEIU], but it hasn’t been—I wish it was,” he told a local news station.

 

Lincoln has long been a labor target for her opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which prompted unions like the AFL-CIO to funnel more than $3 million to Halter’s primary challenge. Now she’s using Halter’s high-profile labor supporters against him, highlighting his meetings “with national labor group[s] in Washington, DC.”  Halter “allows a front group formed a few days ago by national labor unions to do his dirty work,” a Lincoln spokesman recently decried.

Lincoln, of course, has no shortage of backing from Washington special interests and lobbyists—principally from Big Oil, gas, insurance companies, and other moneyed groups who’ve benefited from her corporate-friendly views. And Halter could certainly respond in kind by launching an attack on her own national backers. At the same time, it’s clear that there’s only so far that he’ll run to Lincoln’s left, given Arkansas’ political makeup and industries. On Chris Matthews’ “Hardball” last Friday, Halter defended Wal-Mart, the state’s homegrown corporate giant and long-standing union foe, as a “great employer.” And though he’s significantly more supportive of EFCA than Lincoln, he’s called for a “compromise” on the proposal to facilitate union organizing, rather than outright passage. In the end, Halter seems less liberal than many of his national progressive backers, and he’ll have to carry out a delicate balancing act to continue stoking their support without alienating his voters at home.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate