WorldNet Daily’s Latest Snub

WorldNetDaily released another one of its “explosive” books this week, billing it as the most “exhaustive investigation ever performed into [President] Obama’s political background and radical ties.” Written by Aaron Klein, the reporter who broke the story about Obama’s association with former Weatherman Bill Ayers during the 2008 campaign, The Manchurian President promises to reveal “shocking” new details about Obama’s association with the Nation of Islam, how his “hope” and “change” campaign slogans actually stem from communist activism, and “startling” new facts about his eligibility to serve as president. By Wednesday, the book had already hit #5 on the Amazon top seller list.

What a surprise, then, that so many journalists have refused to read it. According to WND, the mainstream journalists who received free copies for their perusal not only weren’t interested, but they sent really nasty notes to the nice publicist who sent the books:

“Ridiculous crap,” retorted John Oswald, news editor for the New York Daily News.

“Never, ever contact me again,” wrote Time Magazine senior writer Jeffrey Kluger.

Newsweek deputy editor Rana Foroohar quipped, “This is sensational rubbish that is of no interest to any legitimate publication.”

“Absolute crap,” replied Evelyn Leopold, a Huffington Post contributor who served for 17 years as U.N. bureau chief for Reuters until recently.

Nancy Gibbs, editor-at-large for Newsweek, fired, “Remove me from your list.”

David Knowles, AOL’s political writer, responded, “seriously, get a life.”

Ben Wyskida, publicity director for The Nation, claimed Klein’s book is “so offensive” and “so far afield.”

(Mother Jones, sadly, was not sent a copy of the book, but for the record, we would have happily taken one.)

Reporters’ reaction to WND’s latest publishing feat is just the most recent indignity the company has suffered at the hands of the mainstream media. Last month, WND filed suit against the White House Correspondents Association for refusing to give the outfit three tables at its prestigious annual dinner. WND alleges that the association snubbed its White House correspondent, Les Kinsolving, by refusing him a ticket to the event, at which WND had hoped to celebrate the publication of his new biography, Gadfly. So WND engaged Clinton-era legal pest Larry Klayman to sue. It’s demanding $10 million.

WND has griped that it was discriminated against by the association, of which Kinsolving has been a member for much longer than say, anyone at Huffington Post, which got a table at the event even thought it wasn’t even a member of the association a year ago. The WHCA’s action, the complaint says, “harms WND’s access to White House reporting and its reputation generally, as it is being treated as a ‘black sheep’ in the media world.” This isn’t the first time WND has run into trouble with the mainstream media gatekeepers. In 2002, the Senate press gallery denied WND reporters press credentials giving them media access to the Hill. It was ultimately accredited after threatening to sue.

Of course, there’s a reason WND might be getting the cold shoulder. For instance, “Kooky” Kingsolving, as Politico has dubbed him, is famous for asking questions during White House press conferences like this one: “While he was in Hawaii, did the president visit the hospital where he was reportedly born, which is which one?” And it’s not hard to see why the media organizations might not want WND in their midst. Joseph Farah, WND’s publisher, has bought billboard advertising questioning Obama’s citizenship, an issue that has long been settled. (Obama is one.) The group’s reporting ethics have also been a little suspect. Last year, WND published The Muslim Mafia, a book written after the son of one of its authors “infiltrated” the Council on American Islamic Relations by pretending to be a Muslim covert and getting a job there as an intern. He then proceeded to steal a bunch of documents that were later used to write the book.

Still, none of that is any reason for journalists to respond with such hostility to a free book. As with most of the books they get every day from publicists, they don’t have to read it.

UPDATE: Thursday afternoon, WND editor-in-chief Joseph Farah sent out an email promoting The Manchurian President, highlighting the mainstream reporters’ refusal to come near the thing. Much to our amazement, he gives a friendly nod to Mother Jones, writing, “It’s also worth noting that, to their credit, leftist journals like Mother Jones asked for copies of the book. Presumably they have enough intellectual integrity to read before they discount and dismiss.”


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.