Banks Pay Colleges for Students’ Names, Addresses

Flickr/ <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/publicdomainphotos/4259455424/">Photos8</a> (Creative Commons)


Landmark credit-card legislation signed into law last year halted some of the predatory tactics used by banks to attract student borrowers, but the new law hasn’t stopped colleges from preying on their own students. Some of the nation’s largest universities are selling students’ names and addresses to credit-card companies for millions in kickbacks from big, bailed-out financial giants like Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Chase, the Huffington Post Investigative Fund reports.

Through inconspicuous collegiate-corporate relationships known as “affinity agreements,” schools and their alumni associations not only profit from selling students’ personal information, they also earn royalties for each student who keeps a university-sponsored credit card open for more than 90 days. Schools can earn up to three times more—about $3 per cardholder—when students carry a balance on these cards, and some colleges earn bonuses when students incur debt.

The Huffington Post obtained 17 contracts detailing affinity agreements between universities and banks, but it’s unclear just how many of the nation’s 2,700 four-year colleges are involved. At Brown, Bank of America agreed in 2006 to pay $2.3 million over seven years for students’ names and addresses. At Michigan in 2003, the bank agreed to pay $35.5 million over 11 years for its student information. In total, BOA has affinity contracts with some 700 schools, and more than 100 schools are believed to have affinity agreements with other financial institutions, according to the Huffington Post.

Bank of America claims it’s not taking advantage of students; rather, it’s amassing a new base of loyal customers. But consumer advocates beg to differ, questioning whether colleges with affinity agreements are doing enough to safeguard young people from financial ruin. “Universities should place the welfare of their students as their highest priority,” said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director for the federation of state Public Interest Research Groups. “[They] shouldn’t sell them off for profit.”

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.