Andrew Revkin on the Death of the Climate Bill

Membership Ticker

Your gift:
matched.
Your impact:
doubled.

Help keep us strong. The fierce reporting you find here at Mother Jones is possible because we’re funded by readers—not oligarchs or corporations with their own agendas. This week, your donation will be doubled thanks to a $50,000 match. Stand with us. Support journalism that doesn’t flinch.

Help keep us strong. The fierce reporting you find here at Mother Jones is possible because we’re funded by readers—not oligarchs or corporations with their own agendas. This week, your donation—and its impact—will be doubled, thanks to a $50,000 match. Stand with us. Support journalism that doesn’t flinch.

<a href="http://zinasaunders.com/">Illustration: Zina Saunders</a>

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that he will not bring a comprehensive climate bill before the Senate this session. A bill, which called for a cap-and-trade policy to regulate carbon emissions, was approved by the House in June 2009 but the measure lost momentum in the Senate. Is this the end of cap-and-trade? PBS Need to Know‘s Alison Stewart asks New York Times Dot Earth blogger Andrew Revkin to share his reporting on the subject to find out what happened and what might be next.

This podcast was produced by Need to Know for the Climate Desk collaboration.

Click here to watch an animation by Zina Saunders illustrating how Congress gambled with our future when they killed the climate bill.