POGO: DoD Whistleblower System Far From Perfect


Military whistleblowers: watch your back.

Back in July of 2009, the Department of Justice Inspector General’s office issued a report that found that the Pentagon’s system for investigating military whistleblower retaliation has been given the short shrift. Focusing on the Pentagon IG’s Directorate of Military Reprisal Investigations (MRI), the DOJ’s IG report found that the number of military whistleblower retaliation allegations more than doubled between 1997 and 2007, suggesting a considerable dearth of oversight. The previously undisclosed report was obtained by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), an independent watchdog group.

One of the report’s biggest criticisms of the MRI: that the office has failed to resolve complaints within the required 180-day timeframe. “The failure of MRI to meet consistently the statutory time deadline,” it says, “is largely a function of insufficient staffing to handle the large and growing number of reprisal allegations.” The report also found that the military reprisal program wasn’t viewed as a priority with the DoD IG’s office. “We believe that MRI should do more to ensure that cases delegated to the service IGs are assigned for investigation outside the chain of command of the involved parties,” the report adds. The DOJ IG report also recommended greater oversight and better training for IGs.

The DoD IG’s office has been cleaning up its act in the 16 months since the DOJ took it to task. A March 2010 report to Congress shows progress towards implementing Justice Department’s reform recommendations, including increased staffing and improved procedures.

The bad news is that this was a problem in the first place. But at least things are improving. Whistleblowing, of course, violates the armed forces’ foundational culture—respect for the chain of command. But words like Iran-Contra, Tailhook, Abu Ghraib, and Gitmo make it painfully obvious that that chain isn’t immune to perversion. And it’s a big deal that the DoD is acknowledging that.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.