Santorum: ’06 Smackdown Bodes Well for 2012

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/t_bone_photos/4532094045/sizes/m/in/photostream/">tlsmith1000</a>


Rick Santorum, the former US Senator from Pennsylvania, is probably best-known for the uproar he caused in 2003 when he likened homosexuality to beastiality. (He famously said the “definition of marriage” did not include “man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.”) In his reelection bid three years later, Santorum, who has embraced hard-right positions on social issues like abortion rights, was trounced by Democrat Bob Casey by 18 percentage points, the widest margin of defeat for a sitting senator in 23 years.

Now, Santorum is mulling a presidential bid for the 2012 elections. And he’s using his defeat in 2006 as evidence of his conservative credentials, according to the AP:

Santorum said there still could be an opening for someone with his strong social and fiscal conservative views.

“I can look at it and say, ‘I was there doing the things everybody says we should be doing, and I was doing them when they weren’t necessarily the most popular thing to do,'” he said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Santorum hopes the same conservative streak that helped sink his re-election bid in the swing state of Pennsylvania could prove to be an asset in GOP primaries.

“What you’re proposing matters, No. 1, and your authenticity matters,” he said.

But first, Santorum will need an image makeover. As Mother Jones‘ Stephanie Mencimer reported, Santorum has a major online image problem. After Santorum made his inflammatory remarks on homosexuality in 2003, gay columnist Dan Savage held a contest to “memorialize the scandal.” The result: SpreadingSantorum.com, a website that defines “Santorum” as “the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.” Sickening. And effective. When you search “Rick Santorum” in Google, Savage’s site is the third hit. (Number two is the Wikipedia entry “Santorum (sexual neologism).”) Ouch.

MORE HARD-HITTING JOURNALISM

In 2014, before Donald Trump announced his run for president, we knew we had to do something different to address the fundamental challenge facing journalism: how hard-hitting reporting that can hold the powerful accountable can survive as the bottom falls out of the news business.

Being a nonprofit, we started planning The Moment for Mother Jones, a special campaign to raise $25 million for key investments to make Mother Jones the strongest watchdog it can be. Five years later, readers have stepped up and contributed an astonishing $23 million in gifts and future pledges. This is an incredible statement from the Mother Jones community in the face of huge threats—both economic and political—against the free press.

Read more about The Moment and see what we've been able to accomplish thanks to readers' incredible generosity so far, and please join them today. Your gift will be matched dollar for dollar, up to $500,000 total, during this critical moment for journalism.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.