Was Friday Night Lights Xenophobic?


Flickr/Evoo73Flickr/Evoo73Friday Night Lights ended its fifth and final season last week. Needless to say, we’re devastated. But as a small consolation, the show’s ending means that lots of people on the Internet are now posting long-winded scribblings about what it all meant.

Over at Time, James Poniewozik makes a bunch of interesting points in his eulogy for the show, but I have to take issue with his grand takeaway:

The underlying theme is, we need each other. Everyone, even a teenager, is part of a web of dependence. You could see the show, from the right, as an example of how the best social programs are a job, a family and self-discipline; you could see it, from the left, as an argument for the crucial importance of an under-funded government institution, the public school. You would be right both ways.

I suppose I agree with this in a micro-sense—the show is about relationships, not football—but I think the larger point is that FNL didn’t so much bridge the red state-blue state divide as sidestep it. Given how overtly political the original book was, that took some work. The real-life inspiration for Tim Riggins took Buzz Bissinger hunting and complained that Americans don’t make things anymore, while lamenting the fact that we didn’t finish off the Japanese when we had a chance. Bissinger described a town gripped by a tea party-like fervor twenty years before the tea party, but the Dillon, Texas of FNL is exceptionally apolitical.

There was also the total absence of a significant Hispanic character. Slate‘s panel brought this up, as did Tony Lee at the Atlantic, but it’s worth reprising, especially given the demographics of West Texas. Odessa, which Dillon is loosely modeled on, is about 50-percent white and 6-percent black. Hispanics make up more than forty percent of the population, but in the final two seasons of Friday Night Lights account for maybe 10 spoken lines, tops.

We learn the names of three four* Hispanic characters in five seasons: One was thrown off the team for falsely alleging racism; another came from juvie and hung out with a bad crowd; and the third was expelled. A source of serious friction in Odessa circa 1988, Mexican-Americans are practically invisible in 2010. Fictional towns aren’t bound to Census data, but when a show veers so wildly from the reality, it’s worth wondering why.

None of this was to the detriment of FNL‘s brilliance as a television show. Its focus was on relationships—husband-and-wife, parent-sibling, younger brother-older brother, player-and-coach—and it nailed those dynamics better than any show I’ve ever seen. But the argument that the show somehow reconciled liberal sentiments with conservative values needs to acknowledge that it did so only be rewriting the script to ignore some serious divisions.

*Update: I forgot Grandma Saracen’s live-in nurse, Carlotta, who moved back to Guatemala after a brief fling with Matt.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.