The next chapter in our thinking about the oceans is analyzed in a new paper in PLoS ONE. The deep sea—largest of Earth’s ecosystems and its last great wilderness—has been spared much of what’s befallen the rest of the ocean in the last century, thanks to its remoteness. But not any more.
Technology is rapidly undressing this veiled realm, allowing us to exploit its fisheries, hydrocarbons, and minerals at depths below 2,000 meters/6,562 feet. The authors write:
[T]he challenges facing the deep sea are large and accelerating, providing a new imperative for the science community, industry and national and international organizations to work together to develop successful exploitation management and conservation of the deep-sea ecosystem.
The paper represents the combined thinking of 11 researchers from around the world—Spain, UK, Norway, New Zealand, Mexico, US, and France—including some of the biggest names in deep-sea research. Coauthor Lisa Levin, recently made the Director of the Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, was featured in my biodiversity article in MoJo, Gone.
Based on their own extensive experience, combined with published scientific papers, the authors provide a semi-quantitative analysis of the scale of of human activities past, present, and future.
They assessed 28 major anthropogenic impacts (above), grouped into 3 main categories—disposal, exploitation, and climate change. They then examined those effects on 12 deep-sea habitats (below). I’ve added links to explanations of the terms:
Mid-ocean ridges, characterized by benthic sessile fauna and localised demersal and pelagic communities.
Sedimentary slope (excluding other specific communities found on slopes such as cold-water corals, seeps, oxygen minimum zones), characterized by demersal fauna as well as epifaunal and infaunal benthos
Canyons, with a high degree of habitat heterogeneity and diverse fauna varying with substratum: sessile benthos and demersal fauna characterize hard bottoms, while mobile epifauna, infauna and demersal fauna abound in association with soft sediments.
Seamounts, characterized by sessile benthos and abundant localised pelagic communities.
Cold-water coral habitats, including the frame building corals and associated species.
Active hydrothermal vents, characterized by benthic fauna with a high degree of endemicity.
Cold seeps, characterized by benthic fauna with a relatively high degree of endemicity
Oxygen minimum zones abutting margins, characterized by specialized benthic fauna.
Abyssal plains, characterized by mobile epifauna and infauna.
Manganese-nodule provinces, specific habitat on abyssal plains, characterized by sessile and mobile epifauna and infauna.
Trenches, characterized by demersal megafauna and infauna.
Bathypelagic water column, characterized by mid-water species.
The authors conclude that a sea-change is underway:
Based on the current knowledge available in the scientific community and expert estimates, we suggest that the overall anthropogenic impact in the deep sea is increasing, and has evolved from mainly disposal and dumping in the late 20th century, to exploitation in the early 21st century… During the remainder of the current century, we predict that the major impact in the deep sea will be climate change, affecting the oceans globally through direct effects on the habitat and fauna as well as through synergies with other human activities.
The deep-sea habitats most affected at present are:
- Sediment slopes, mainly affected by fishing—trawling, longlining, and ghost fishing caused by lost or discarded gear
- Cold-water corals, which are especially vulnerable to damage from fishing gear that can destroy whole communities
- Canyons, mainly affected by fishing
- Oxygen-minimum zones, most threatened by by climate change and significant increases in hypoxia.
They paper provides a valuable summary of protected deep-sea habits worldwide. And it describes the biggest hurdle in the life-cycle of any protected ocean area—the ability of slow-funded science to keep up with the big money of industry and development. Add bureaucratic foot-dragging into the mix and the race to protect the real value of the deep becomes even more lopsided.
They authors close with a call to arms, suggesting that human encroachment into the deep sea creates a new conservation imperative… and that effective stewardship will require continued exploration, basic scientific research, monitoring, and conservation measures—all at the same time.
Conservation in the deep sea offers challenges in the form of knowledge gaps, climate change uncertainties, shifting jurisdictions and significant enforcement difficulties. With time, technological advances can help address these challenges. It remains to be seen whether new approaches must be developed to conserve the biodiversity and ecosystem services we value in the deepest half of the planet.
- Ramirez-Llodra E, Tyler PA, Baker MC, Bergstad OA, Clark MR, et al. (2011) Man and the Last Great Wilderness: Human Impact on the Deep Sea. PLoS ONE 6(8): e22588. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022588