Man, That Debt Ceiling Fight Sucked! Let’s Do It Again!

Think the partisan warfare over the nation’s debt is over? Think again.

President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/6002648839/in/photostream">The White House</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Monday, with a flick of his pen, President Obama signed the Budget Control Act of 2011, ending a contentious, months-long fight over the nation’s debt ceiling, spending, and taxes that brought the nation to the brink of default and possibly economic catastrophe. You could almost hear the collective sigh of relief as the president turned the lopsided, GOP-friendly bill into the law of the land.

At least we won’t have to go through that again—or so you might think.

Bzzt. Wrong. If you listen to Republicans, you’ll know the debt ceiling fight was just the beginning.

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), in remarks on the Senate floor on Monday, described the Republican tactic of refusing to raise the debt ceiling in order to extract favorable concessions as “a new way of doing business in Washington.” He went on: “One of the most important things about this legislation is the fact that never again will any president, from either party, be allowed to raise the debt ceiling without being held accountable for it by the American people and without having to engage in the kind of debate we’ve just come through.”

McConnell is the Senate minority leader and one of the most influential Republicans in Washington. He shapes GOP strategy in Congress as effectively as any fellow party member. You should believe him when he says that the rancorous fights over lifting the nation’s borrowing limit are here to stay.

The next battle will involve the 12-person “supercommittee” tasked with trimming the federal deficit by another $1.5 trillion. Democrats and Republicans will clash over which lawmakers get named to the committee. Will they be intransigent ideologues or malleable moderates? Although President Obama has repeatedly insisted that future budget changes be “balanced” between spending cuts and new revenues, Republicans will shun the few members in their ranks who could stomach revenue increases. McConnell, an avowed enemy of tax hikes, will pick three supercommittee members. GOPers, he said on Monday, will “make sure that the Republicans who sit on the powerful cost-cutting committee are serious people who put the best interests of the American people, and the principles that we’ve fought for throughout this debate, first.”

The principles that we’ve fought for throughout this debate. Translation: “Read my lips: No new taxes.

Of course, after the selection process, the supercommittee itself must move quickly to identify ways to slim the deficit. Expect a Herculean lobbying effort to sway the committee’s recommendations. Party leaders pushed and prodded and cajoled their members in the recent debt ceiling fight; they’re sure to do the same during the committee’s deliberations. And the lobbying will only intensify as members of Congress debate whether to vote yes or no on the committee’s recommendations.

It’s also important to know that the Budget Control Act raises the short-term debt ceiling by just $900 billion. In February 2012, President Obama can request another $1.5 trillion increase in the ceiling, pushing back the next debt battle until early 2013. But that second increase is contingent on Congress approving the supercommittee’s plan or a yet-to-be-written balanced-budget amendment being sent to all 50 states.

You can expect another bout of debt ceiling battling this holiday season as Congress tries to shape the supercommittee’s plan and, later, votes on it. And that’s just in the next five months. After the 2012 election, President Obama or his Republican replacement will have to raise the debt ceiling again, setting up future fights like the one that just ended. So brace yourself: The debt ceiling wars look like they’re just getting started.

More Mother Jones reporting on Dark Money

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate