Scott Walker Recall Campaign Is On

A movie theater marquee in downtown Madison catches the Recall Scott Walker spirit.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/_kristy_/5519069170/sizes/m/in/photostream/">_kristy_</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The group United Wisconsin has announced it will launch a recall effort targeting Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker beginning next month.

United Wisconsin, a political action committee formed by grassroots organizers to recall Walker and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, says it will file papers on November 15 with Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board to begin the recall effort. Organizers will have 60 days to collect 540,208 signatures to trigger a recall election, but they hope to gather 700,000—enough to withstand legal challenges by their opponents. In its release announcing the recall effort, United Wisconsin says it has already gathered more than 200,000 pledges from Wisconsinites saying they’d sign a Walker recall petition. The release describes the recall effort as a collaboration between United Wisconsin and “numerous other grassroots groups, political leaders of all stripes, seniors, educators, veterans, and religious leaders of all faiths.”

The idea for a Walker recall grew out of the massive protests that engulfed Madison, the state capital, this winter and spring in response to Walker’s anti-union budget repair bill. The bill curbed collective bargaining rights for most public-sector unions in Wisconsin, while making it harder for those unions to collect member dues and forcing them to re-certify each year. The overall effect has been to weaken organized labor’s influence in Wisconsin, a traditionally pro-union state where the first public-sector unions were formed. More than 100,000 people protested Walker’s bill and the Republicans in the Wisconsin legislature who supported it, occupying the rotunda of the state Capitol building and filling the streets surrounding the Capitol, an uprising that captured the nation’s attention for weeks. Walker ultimately prevailed, signing the bill into law in March; after surviving several legal challenges, the bill went into effect in June.

A Walker recall promises a political battle just as divisive as the one that unfolded this summer in Wisconsin. Targeted for their actions during the bitter debate over Walker’s repair bill, three Democrats and six Republicans in the Wisconsin state Senate faced recall challenges, with Democrats needing a net gain of three seats to flip the Senate majority. In the end, though, Democrats netted only two seats, and both sides claimed victory: GOPers for clinging to their majority, and Democrats for their two wins. Nonetheless, the failure to win back the majority appeared to drain some of the Democrats’ momentum as they eyed the biggest recall of them all: Scott Walker.

Now, Wisconsin progressives and Democrats must convince their supporters to gear up for one more recall battle in 2011. That’s a steep challenge: the memory of this summer’s spate of toxic ads and constant mud-slinging is no doubt still fresh in the minds of many. Throughout the summer, polls showed Wisconsinites split on the idea of challenging Walker, though a recent Democratic Party of Wisconsin poll found that independents supported recalling Walker, 52 percent to 36 percent. Is there enough anger left at Walker’s policies to mobilize against him? Or will that effort, like this summer’s elections, fall just short?

In a conference call with reporters, United Wisconsin officials stressed that the time was right to recall Walker. “I think the momentum is just as strong, if not stronger,” said United Wisconsin co-chair Kevin Straka. Straka and co-chair Ryan Lawler were, however, short on details about their get-out-the-vote strategy or messaging plans, a sign of the grassroots nature of this recall effort. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin will help sign up volunteers and raise money for the recall, but so far the campaign itself is looking like a truly bottom-up operation. 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate