Which Is Weirder—Iowa or New Hampshire? Take the Quiz.

Variations on a theme: Grant Wood's American Gothic (left), and the label for New Hampshire-based Smuttynose IPA<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Grant_DeVolson_Wood_-_American_Gothic.jpg">Grant Wood</a>/Wikimedia Commons; <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tuaussi/1753020912/sizes/z/in/photostream/">Smuttynose Brewing Company</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


New Hampshire voters are different than you. So we’ve been told, anyway. “New Hampshire voters are no pushovers,” writes the Los Angeles Times, informing us the the residents of the Granite State are, variously, “cranky,” “obdurate,” and “independent.” They’re also “Yankee stoics,” “no-nonsense,” and “rock-ribbed,” adds McClatchy’s David Lightman. Conservative talk radio host Mark Steyn calls New Hampshirites “crusty,” “cranky,” and “contrarian.” Hardball host Chris Matthews attempted to sum up the state’s electorate as “real,” “American,” and “flinty.” “We take the vetting of the candidates very seriously,” says Republican Kelly Ayotte, the state’s junior senator.

New Hampshire voters are many things (or at least many different varieties of rock), but one thing they are absolutley not is Iowan. That’s the message that’s seeped out over the last 12 months or so from politicians, editorial boards, and even a few candidates. “They pick corn in Iowa; they pick presidents in New Hampshire,” said Jon Huntsman, who’s banking his presidential fortunes on the relative cranky flintiness of Granite State residents. MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell best captured the conventional wisdom, explaining that, contra New Hampshire, Iowa is “too white, too evangelical, too rural” to make much of a difference on the GOP nominating race. (New Hampshire is 93.9 percent white; Iowa is 91 percent).

But are they really so different? My colleague Andy Kroll busted the myth of New Hampshire maverick voter on Friday. And a quick comparison of the two states’ legislative activity over the last three years reveals some serious overlap. Is Iowa the crazy one? Or was it New Hampshire? Match the nutty proposal with the appropriate state:

1.) Warning that the legalization of gay marriage would bring about undesired changes to the state, a Republican state senator in 2010 vows to be “vigilant” in preventing state parks from offering family discounts to same-sex couples.

2.) Republicans attempt to repeal gay marriage in the state in 2011, due to concerns that allowing two men to tie the know “would facilitate the introduction of an aspect of Shariah or Islamic law that permits a man to have up to four wives.”

3.) Two Republican state representatives ask the state attorney general in January to reconsider whether President Barack Obama was qualified to appear on the November ballot, alleging that the president may not be a natural-born citien because his father was born in Kenya. After a birther lawsuit was thrown out in November, two top aides to the state attorney general “locked themselves in an office and called capitol security” because they feared for their safety.

4.) State senator introduces birther bill in 2011 to require “birth certificates to be filed with affidavits of candidacy for presidential and vice presidential candidates”

5.) State Legislature consider a bill mandating that any new law that affects individual liberties “include a direct quote from the Magna Carta” explaining where those rights came from.

6.) Local tea party group purchases billboard comparing President Obama to Hitler and Lenin, with the slogan “live free or die.”

7.) State Legislature floats proposal in 2012 to force public schools to teach students about the moral bankruptcy of the theory of evolution. “It’s a worldview and it’s godless,” one state representative explains. “Atheism has been tried in various societies, and they’ve been pretty criminal domestically and internationally. The Soviet Union, Cuba, the Nazis, China today: They don’t respect human rights.”

8.) State House passes a 2009 bill asserting state sovereignty and considers another resolution two years later to nullify the Affordable Care Act.

9.) Considers legislation in 2011 that would classify the murder of abortion providers as “justifiable homicide.”

10.) In 2010 House Republicans attempt to repeal a law requiring public schools to provide kindergarten.

11.) Picks Pat Buchanan over Bob Dole in 1996.

12.) Picks Pat Robertson over George H.W. Bush for president in 1988.

Answers: 1.) IA, 2.) NH, 3.) NH, 4.) IA, 5.) NH, 6.) IA, 7.) NH, 8.) NH, 9.) IA, 10.) NH, 11.) NH, 12.) IA.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate