Chinese “Occupy” Obama’s Google+ Page

President Barack Obama reaching out a hand to Chinese President Hu Jintao<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/4140424101/">The White House</a>/Flickr


A crack appeared recently in the Great Firewall of Chinawhere the government blocks Facebook and Twitter and censors search terms like “democracy”, “human rights”, and “dictatorship”. Google noticed early last week that Chinese netizens started accessing its social network Google+ and almost immediately began inundating President Obama’s page, Reuters reported yesterday. In what seemed like a mad scramble, commenters posted as early as 5:00 a.m. in China to be one of the 500 comments Google allows on each post. Google says it had not implemented any changes that would have allowed for access, which suggests that Chinese web users may have found a censorship loophole by surfing the internet on their cell phones rather than personal computers.

Some of the Google+ commenters joke that they are “? (zhan)”—occupying—Obama’s page. Others offer tongue-in-cheek commentary, complimenting the president’s physical appearance or asking him for travel recommendations. But the ones that captured the interest of news outlets—from the Washington Post to the BBC—are fearlessly political:

Even more surprising is the unusual absence of jingoistic China defenders who commonly rebut pro-democracy, pro-America comments in Chinese internet forums. For example, here are some comments to an article on popular web portal Netease about Beijing’s spate of sky-blackening pollution last December. 

“It’s just fog, the air quality is still very good.”

“It’s five times better than the weather in the U.S.”

Chinese netizens refer to these posters as the Wumaodangthe “Fifty-Cent Party”—because it’s widely rumored that these commenters are paid by the government (fifty-cents per post) to populate web forums with pro-Communist Party verbiage. The absence of these comments on Obama’s Google+ page gives us a rare glimpse of Chinese public debate without the noise of paid shills.

FACT:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2019 demands.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.