Sorry, Mitt Romney Did Not Say He Wants to End Planned Parenthood

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davelawrence8/6791949310/sizes/z/in/photostream/"davelawrence8">DaveLawrence8</a>/Flickr


Mitt Romney wants to get rid of Planned Parenthood! So went the spin being pushed out on Tuesday by President Obama’s reelection campaign, which  blasted out an email directing reporters to a line in a speech Romney gave in Kirkwood Missouri: “Planned Parenthood, we’re going to get rid of that.” The story went viral, lighting up Twitter and even sneaking its way onto CNN’s election-night coverage. Coming at the end of a month spent talking about contraception and Komen, it was a fairly damning quote.

But that quote was missing some key context. Mitt Romney didn’t say he wanted to get rid of Planned Parenthood, period. He included it in a list of items he wanted to defund at the federal level. Per KSDK St. Louis:

As for ways to reduce debt, he suggests a few cuts.

“The test is pretty simple. Is the program so critical, it’s worth borrowing money from China to pay for it? And on that basis of course you get rid of Obamacare, that’s the easy one. Planned Parenthood, we’re going to get rid of that. The subsidy for Amtrak, I’d eliminate that. The National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities,” he said.

Which isn’t to say he’s off the hook. Planned Parenthood provides critical services to millions of American women, and without federal funding, it’d be forced to scale back those operations considerably. As a public policy matter, Romney’s decisions woud have tremendous consequences, and family planning funding has the benefit of being extremely cost-effective. But it’s also, at this point, fairly standard Republican posturing—and consistent with what Romney has been saying for a while. Though not consistent, it’s worth recalling, with what he was saying back in 1994, when he attended a Planned Parenthood  fundraiser with his wife, Ann, a PP donor.

Update: Per HuffPo‘s Sam Stein, Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom clarifies that Romney was referring specifically to funding.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.