Cubs Owner Takes Over Nebraska Senate Race

Chicago Cubs owner Joe Ricketts (left) at Wrigley Field.Imago/ZumaPress.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Cubs might finally win one.

On Tuesday, Nebraska Republicans will pick their nominee to take on former Sen. Bob Kerrey (D) in November’s US Senate election (Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson is retiring). It’s a fairly straightforward race—in one corner, there’s establishment pick Jon Bruning, the state’s attorney general; in the other is state Sen. Deb Fischer, a tea party favorite who has the backing of Sarah Palin. Fischer holds a narrow lead according to the most recent poll of the race, and she’s had a little bit of help. As Nebraska Watchdog reports, over the final week of the campaign, a super-PAC called Ending Spending Action Fund has poured $200,000 into television ads attacking Bruning for using his political connections for his own enrichment. One week ago, Bruning had a 16-point lead. Now he trails Fischer by five points.

Who’s behind Ending Spending? Just one man: Joe Ricketts, billionaire founder of TD Ameritrade, father of 2006 Nebraska GOP Senate candidate Tom Peter Ricketts, and owner, with his family, of Major League Baseball’s Chicago Cubs.

Ricketts, you may recall, is also one of the leading donors behind the Campaign for Primary Accountability, the super-PAC dedicated to financing primary challenges to entrenched incumbents in both parties. Ricketts gave that group $500,000. In 2010, Ending Spending dumped $600,000—all of it from Joe Ricketts—into the Nevada Senate race in the final month of the campaign in support of Sen. Harry Reid’s GOP challenger Sharron Angle. As Huffington Post‘s Amanda Terkel reported, the super-PAC was formed one month before the election, and its treasurer, Nancy Watkins, served as the treasurer for three other dark money outfits.

Super-PACs have been a dominant story of the presidential campaign so far, but their influence is just as pronounced at the state and district level, where a large sum of money can easily tip the scales in favor of one candidate or another.

Update: Cubs win! Cubs win! The Associated Press has called the race for Fischer.

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate