July 19, 2012

Anti-Obama Group Caught Using US Military Logos Without Authorization

“Special Operations for America” must stop politicizing military insignia, US officials tell MoJo, or face possible legal action.

Risky business: The military wants its trademarked symbols off this anti-Obama group's logo.Screenshot: <a href="http://soforamerica.org/">soforamerica.org/</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When you set up a Swift Boat-style front group to accuse President Obama of stealing credit for the military’s valor, maybe it’s not the best idea to steal the military’s official logos in the process. “Special Operations for America,” a new super-PAC* endorsing Mitt Romney for president and ridiculing Obama over the Osama bin Laden raid, appears to have done precisely that. By using part or all of the insignia of the Marines, Air Force, Navy, Army, and the US Special Operations Command on its website, Facebook, and Twitter pages, the super-PAC has run afoul of military regulations, according to representatives of the US Marine Corps and Air Force who spoke to Mother Jones.

According to the Department of Defense, each service branch’s symbols are trademarked, and their commercial and political use is tracked closely by military officials to prevent any appearance of the military’s endorsing a partisan or for-profit cause. The officials said they will be contacting the group and asking them to stop using the insignia or face potential legal action.SOFA's logo using official US military insignia. Screenshot: soforamerica.org/SOFA’s logo using official US military insignia. Screenshot: soforamerica.org/

“They don’t have permission to use the Marine Corps eagle, globe, and anchor in promotion of their service,” said Jessica O’Haver, director of the Marine Corps’ trademark licensing program, after inspecting the super-PAC’s website and checking her database. “We can’t appear to endorse them…We don’t currently license nonprofits and charities, especially if they’re promoting a political cause.” O’Haver added that since the super-PAC’s website includes marks from the other services, she’ll be contacting the DOD’s Trademark Office so that it can notify the PAC about its unauthorized use of the material.

“We’ll be doing the same thing,” Staff Sgt. Jarrod Chavana, a representative of the Air Force’s Trademark and Licensing Program, said regarding the group. “It’s against military regulations for people to use [the Air Force logo] for political purposes.”

Officially launched this week, the anti-Obama super-PAC is led by Ryan Zinke, a retired Navy SEAL and conservative state senator from Montana. “It is time to take back America,” the group’s site exhorts would-be donors. “Your support of Special Operations for America (“SOFA”) is vital to the success of our mission: Advocating for the election of Mitt Romney and like-minded candidates…who believe in permanent and enduring American Exceptionalism.”

Part of that mission is firing away at President Obama for allegedly spiking the bin Laden football. “Navy SEAL’s, Special Operations Personnel and Veteran’s across America have been outraged since Barack Obama conveniently took credit for killing Osama Bin Laden for political gain,” writes Zinke. The headline on the press release announcing the group on Wednesday trumpeted Zinke as “Former Commander at SEAL TEAM SIX.” That seems a bit misleading: The unit, now known as DEVGRU, hasn’t officially been called SEAL Team Six since 1987, and Zinke once led subordinate units, not the entire SEAL Team.

The group’s tactics are nothing new: They’ve partnered with the soft-money group Veterans for a Strong America and its leader, South Dakota political operative Joel Arends, who deployed a web ad back in May that blasted Obama for taking “so much credit for killing Bin Laden.” But “Special Operations for America” has now gone a step farther by wrapping itself in the US military’s official symbols.

Mother Jones emailed SOFA for comment, but the group didn’t respond by publication time. What will happen once they are notified that they can’t use the military logos? Such organizations tend to respond in one of two ways, according to O’Haver. Most take the trademarked material down and offer apologies. “Sometimes, though, we get a cheeky letter back,” she says. “I forward them to our legal department.”

Correction: The story originally identified the group as a PAC rather than a super-PAC.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate