Ann Romney and the Subversive Conservatism of ABC’s ‘Modern Family’

Actors Eric Stonestreet and Jesse Tyler Ferguson, who play Modern Family's Cameron and Mitchell, at the Human Rights Campaign national dinner in 2010. <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EStonestreet_JTFerguson_HRC_National_Dinner_2010.jpg" target="_blank">Wikimedia</a>

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


Would-be First Lady Ann Romney’s favorite television show is ABC’s Modern Family, a relatively tame sitcom that features three related couples raising children. One of these couples, Cameron and Mitchell, happens to be a cohabitating same-sex couple with an adopted daughter. The Republican Platform for 2012 calls for a constitutional amendment that, in the real world, would forbid the government from legally recognizing relationships like the one Cameron and Mitchell have.

The irony was not lost on the show’s co-creator, Steven Levitan, who offered Mrs. Romney a role on the show. “We’ll offer her the role of officiate at Mitch & Cam’s wedding. As soon as it’s legal,” he wrote on Twitter. Naturally, if Mrs. Romney’s husband has his way, this will never happen. Mitt Romney is not merely opposed to same-sex marriage, but legal recognition of same-sex couples of any kind.

Ann Romney however, is not alone in her fondness for the show. A 2010 survey found that Modern Family ranks as Republicans’ third favorite show on television

This might seem strange, were it not for the fact that the great irony of Modern Family is that its view of “family” is tremendously conservative and traditional. There are three couples on the show: The aforementioned Mitchell and Cameron, Mitchell’s sister Claire and her husband Phil, and Claire and Mitchell’s father Jay and his second wife Gloria. Each of these couples features a (male) breadwinner and a stay-at-home parent whose primary responsibility is to the children. Despite their superficial differences—the noticable age and aesthetic differences between Jay (Married with Children‘s Ed O’Neill) and Gloria (Sofia Vergara), the fact that Mitchell and Cameron are men—the vision of family on the show is one that hews very closely to what conservatives like to call the “traditional family.” The show has also been very restrained in its portrayal of Mitchell and Cameron’s relationship—they did not so much as kiss until the second season. The show’s subject matter is also pretty vanilla—couples’ weird foibles, kids do the darndest things and so forth—with the few bawdy jokes usually being too complicated for anyone who isn’t an adult to pick up on. 

Modern Family‘s traditionalism probably has much to do with why conservatives, including Ann Romney, like the show so much. It portrays a future in which the “modern family” exists within comforting, familiar framework.  The show is subversive in its conservatism, in its ability to make Republicans see themselves in a family arrangement that, to this day, they remain steadfastly opposed. Eventually, these Republicans will come to recognize the contradiction between their affinity for these characters on television and their opposition to equal rights for their real life counterparts. 

This is how culture wars are won. 

 

Click here for more TV and movie features from Mother Jones.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.