GOP Rep. Paul Broun Says Obama Upholds the Soviet Constitution, Doesn’t Specify Which One

Official White House photo.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/42107447@N00/5324533596/">SS&SS</a>/Flickr


According to a guy who’s questioned Barack Obama’s citizenship, thinks America is headed for a Leninist dictatorship, and has called evolution and other science “lies straight from the pit of Hell,” the president and his congressional allies are taking their marching orders from the Constitution…just not the American one.

“I don’t know what Constitution that other members of Congress uphold, but it’s not this one,” Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) said on Tuesday afternoon, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution‘s Jim Galloway. “I think the only Constitution that Barack Obama upholds is the Soviet constitution, not this one. He has no concept of this one, though he claimed to be a constitutional lawyer.”

The Soviet Union was dissolved in December 1991. For all his years in the public eye, Barack Obama has only ever had mean things to say about the former Communist stateIt’s pretty clear that there’s nothing to suggest that President Obama adheres to the “Soviet constitution.” What isn’t clear is which Soviet constitution Broun was referring to.

During the seven-decade existence of the Soviet Union, the government approved three separate constitutions. There is the one approved in 1924, which defines the “camp of capitalism” as “national hate and inquality, colonial slavery and chauvinism, national oppression and massacres, brutalities and imperialistic wars.” The one adopted in 1936 (also called “Stalin’s Constitution”) actually pays a lot of lip service to universal suffrage, individual rights, health care, and the like. And the constitution adopted in 1977 (also called the “Brezhnev Constitution”) praises the Soviet people, their army, and Vladimir Lenin for winning the Russian Civil War and therefore starting the “epoch-making turn of mankind from capitalism to socialism.”

I reached out to the congressman’s Washington office to ask which of these three he meant. Perhaps Broun was referring to all of them. I will update this post if I get a response.

h/t Pema Levy

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.