“Arrested Development” Creator Explains How Herman Cain Inspired Season 4—and Cain Responds

Herman Cain, left, and Herbert Love (played by actor Terry Crews).<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/22007612@N05/6327562092">Gage Skidmore</a>/Flickr ; <a href="http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/Arrested_Development/70140358?locale=en-US">Netflix</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The new season of Arrested Development has a sharp political edge that should feel familiar to fans of the show. The series’ original three-season run on Fox, which aired between 2003 and 2006, contained some of the richest TV satire of the Iraq War and Bush years (bad WMD intel, “Mission Accomplished,” “preemptive strike,” Abu Ghraib, CIA dysfunction, war protests, and so on). The fourth season, which debuted on Netflix in late May, depicts the infamous Bluth family in the context of a new political era, one defined by the American housing crisis, economic collapse, and out-of-control drone warfare. But of all the political elements of this long-awaited season, arguably the most important—or at least most visible—real-world inspiration for this new batch of episodes is Herman Cain, the one-time 2012 GOP presidential front-runner and former pizza baron.

One of the fourth season’s central story arcs involves an illicit sexual relationship between Lindsay Bluth Fünke (played by Portia de Rossi) and Herbert Love (played by Arrested newcomer Terry Crews), a charismatic, philandering California Republican congressional candidate explicitly modeled after Cain. Both are black, bespectacled, and intensely conservative and anti-Obama, and Love’s “low-high” economic prescription sounds an awful lot like Cain’s widely blasted 9-9-9 tax plan. (Furthermore, both men use Krista Branch’s song “I Am America” in their campaigns, and Love’s campaign manager looks, acts, and smokes like Cain’s 2012 chief of staff Mark Block.)

Cain is well aware of this satirical, comic rendering of his 2012 “Cain Train“—he just couldn’t care less about it. “I heard about it, haven’t seen it, and I’m unfazed by it,” Cain said in a statement sent to Mother Jones. “In the vernacular of my grandfather, ‘I does not care.'”

During a conference call on Wednesday, Arrested Development creator and executive producer Mitchell Hurwitz revealed exactly why he and his creative team focused so much on lampooning Cain in the show’s fourth season. Hurwitz had already planned on mining the Republican presidential field for satire and topicality. One idea was to cast some famous and extremely good-looking actors—including George Clooney—to play a family of “Mexican Romneys” in the new season. That idea was ultimately left unfulfilled, which gave Hurwitz time to turn his attention to Cain.

“[When we were writing this,] the Republican Party was a little desperate…so trounced, as has been well-documented, by the Democrats,” Hurwitz told me. That desperation manifested itself in what Hurwitz saw as some interesting cable-TV spin. “Any black man on any news show [during that election] was a Republican!…If you were to look at the spin created by the party at that time, it would look like it’s a 90 percent African American party.” And Cain’s unique, brazen persona (not to mention his turbulent underdog campaign) was too much for Hurwitz not to acknowledge. “He was such a charismatic…[and kind of] adorable guy. So funny, so interesting, it just felt like a rich area for comedy. And it also felt just politically incorrect enough.”

“Here’s a good way to make fun of a guy who happens to be black. Let’s make him a Republican!”

Hurwitz also expressed his view that it is often “very difficult” to deal with minority or female characters in TV comedy, due to the all-to-common constraints and demands of political correctness and oversensitivity. “Whether it’s gays…or African Americans…[TV writers] tend to say this character has got to be kind of flawless,” Hurwitz says. Another example Hurwitz points to is moms—in many sitcoms, the “mom is the only one who has their shit together,” he says.

With the Herbert Love character—and with Cain as prime inspiration—Hurwitz and company had found their way out of that bind. “[We said to ourselves], ‘Here’s a good way to make fun of a guy who happens to be black. Let’s make him a Republican!'”

To get a better idea of the Cain-influenced character, you can binge-watch the whole season on Netflix now. Or you can check out this interview with Terry Crews, who plays the part of Love:

Mark Block did not respond to requests for comment.

Click here for more TV and movie coverage from Mother Jones.

To read Asawin’s reviews, click here.

To listen to the movie and pop-culture podcast that Asawin cohosts with ThinkProgress critic Alyssa Rosenberg, click here.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate